ABSTRACT
Background Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is an important cause of disease in older adults. Vaccines against RSV infections and respiratory diseases are in large market demand. Although there are currently two licensed RSV-based pre-F antigen vaccines available for older adults, no G antigen-based RSV vaccine is authorized. This phase 2 study aimed to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of a recombinant G protein-based RSV vaccine in this population.
Methods A phase-2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study was conducted to evaluate the safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of the BARS13 (rRSV G protein with CsA) when administered by an intramuscular (IM) injection to healthy participants 60 to 80 years old. A total of 125 eligible participants were randomized in a 3:1 ratio (vaccine versus placebo) for Cohorts 1 and 2 and randomized in a 2:1 ratio for Cohort 3 to receive one of the three treatment regimens or placebo.
Results The average age was 65.3, and 50.4% (63/125) were men. Until the interim analysis (4 weeks following the last vaccination), no treatment-related SAE occurred. TEAEs did not increase with vaccination dosage or frequency. All adverse effects were mild or moderate, not severe or life-threatening. BARS13 vaccination increased IgG anti-RSV antibody levels in all cohorts, but higher doses and frequency boosted immune responses significantly. The high-dose thrice-administered recipients had serum-specific IgG antibody GMC of 881.0 IU/mL (95% CI: 794.5-1473.4) before the first dose (Week 0), 1116.3 IU/mL (95% CI:990.7-1772.5) 4 weeks after the first dose (Week 4), 1309.4IU/mL (95% CI: 1162.8-2041.5) 4 weeks after the second dose (Week 8), and1359.6 IU/mL (95% CI: 1197.9-2525.7) 4 weeks after the third dose (Week 12). For the low-dose twice-administered recipients, 84% responded at 4 weeks after the first immunization (Week 4) and 83.3% at 4 weeks after the second (Week 8). The high-dose twice-administered recipients had 95.5% response at 4 weeks after the first immunization (Week 4) and 72.2% at 4 weeks after the second (Week 8). At Week 4, 85.7% of high-dose thrice-administered recipients responded, 85.2% at Week 8, and 79.2% at Week 12.
Conclusions The study demonstrates the safety and tolerability of BARS13 across different dose groups. Adverse reactions were not significantly different among participants receiving varying doses of BARS13. Levels of anti-G antibodies exhibited a dose- and frequency-dependent responses in the older population. The continuous upward trend in antibody concentration up to the interim analysis is promising for the effectiveness of BARS13.
Competing Interest Statement
All the authors are employees of Advaccine Biopharmaceuticals Suzhou Co., Ltd.
Clinical Trial
NCT04681833
Funding Statement
This study was funded by the National Major Scientific and Technological Special Project for Program of Significant New Drug Developments [2013ZX09102041], National Natural Science Foundation of China [81991492 and 82041039], and Major Project of Study on Pathogenesis and Epidemic Prevention Technology System [2021YFC2302500].
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Bellberry Human Research Ethics Committee (protocol code ADVA-BARS13-002 and approved on 01 February 2021) for the clinical trial. See more details at https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04681833?term=NCT04681833&rank=1
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
