Abstract
Households that burn biomass in inefficient open fires – a practice that results in $1.6 trillion in global damages from health impacts and climate-altering emissions yearly – are often unable to access cleaner alternatives, like gas, which is widely available but unaffordable, or electricity, which is unattainable for many due to insufficient supply and reliability of electricity services. Governments are often reluctant to make gas affordable. We argue that condemnation of all fossil fuel subsidies is short-sighted and does not adequately consider subsidizing gas for cooking as a potential strategy to improve public health and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
US National Institutes of Health grant 1UM1HL134590 5 in collaboration with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP1131279) (AP) Clean Cooking Implementation Science Network of the US National Institutes of Health (AP)
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
‡ Our title draws inspiration from Kirk R. Smith (2002) ‘In praise of petroleum?’ Science and Kirk R. Smith (2014) ‘In praise of power’ Science.
Improved and clarified analysis approach (in particular for India and Kenya scenarios), added Figure 1.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors and will be made publicly available upon publication.
