Abstract
Traumatic brain injury and neuro-degenerative diseases leave people dependent and with a low quality of life. Several technologies have been proposed to connect the central nervous system to silicon circuitry and thereby circumvent the damaged nervous tissue that is impairing normal function. These technologies rely upon a language of subtle movements within a patient’s capability to direct computer operations, however, selecting the proper abstraction for even a task as simple as moving a computer cursor can be challenging. Involuntary movements can create noise and false positives for the brain-computer-interface (BCI) receptors, and non-intuitive abstractions can be a barrier for adoption by neurologically damaged patients. We therefore introduce Visualization of Arrow Movements (VAM) as a set of mental tasks for controlling cursor movements in a BCI system. The performance of VAM was evaluated by six untrained subjects via 10-fold cross validation using band power and k-Nearest Neighbor classification methods as well as linear discriminant analysis (LDA) after spatial filtering. The binary classification accuracy in recognizing VAM tasks from each other was between 92% and 100% for four subjects and between 66% and 72% for the other two participants, which suggests that the tasks are most intuitive for even untrained persons. Non-EEG analysis revealed that this performance does not originate from ocular or other facial movements, but from cerebral electrical activity. The high classification accuracy and intuitive abstraction suggest that VAM is a promising abstraction for BCI systems.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was funded by the US National Science Foundation through grant MCB-1449014, the National Institutes of Health 11-P20-GM113126-01, hi Sa the NSF EPSCoR EPS- 1004094, and the CCF-1161767. Also, the grant is supported by NIH 11-P20-GM113126-01. The authors would also like to thank KBase developers for their active support throughout the development of this research.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics Review Committee, Faculty of Medicine - University of Peradeniya, Approval number: 2009/EC/36
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵* e-mail: sszahmeeth{at}gmail.com
Data Availability
All data produced are available online at: https://zenodo.org/record/8264860
