Prevalence and pattern of Post Covid-19 symptoms in recovered patients of Delhi: A Population-Based study

1 Introduction

Severe acute respiratory syndrome 2 coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2), initially diagnosed in China in December 2019, caused a global pandemic. It was associated with an exponential increase in cases and deaths, overwhelming health infrastructure [1]. On 5^th May 2023, WHO declared an end to Covid -19 as a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) with >768 million cases and >6.9 million deaths reported to date. [2]. The pandemic triggered a series of epidemiological studies to understand disease transmission, prevention and control measures. The variability of disease based on strain in circulation and poor understanding of pathophysiology resulted in many trial treatments during the phase of outbreak surge. The wide clinical spectrum of SARS-CoV-2 also made the disease complex to understand due to multi-organ involvement [3] [4].

The acute Covid-19 infection across the literature is reported to last up to 4 weeks before recovery [5]. However, there is growing evidence that signs and symptoms related to Covid-19 infection continue to persist post-recovery in a significant proportion of cases. The condition characterized by the continued existence of symptoms after the initial infection and recovery from Covid-19 has been termed “Long-Covid”, “Post-covid” and “Post-acute Covid-19 syndrome” [5]. There is a lack of consensus on the characteristics defining this condition. The British Medical Association defines a syndrome “as a set of medical signs and symptoms which are correlated with each other and associated with a particular disease’’ [6] The National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (UK) defined post-covid-syndrome as “a cluster of signs and symptoms that develop during or after an infection consistent with COVID-19, continue for more than 12 weeks and are not explained by an alternative diagnosis.” [5] The long-term symptoms of Covid-19 can involve cardiopulmonary symptoms (decline in respiratory function, fibrosis, pleural involvement, myocarditis, pericardial effusion), post covid-19 thrombosis, immune-mediated manifestations (arthritis, myositis, pancreatitis), and other skin, neurological, renal, haematological, endocrine and systemic manifestations [5, 7]. The impact of persistent Covid-19 symptoms is reported significant on the mental health and emotional well-being of patients [8].

To date, there has been limited exploratory research on post-covid syndrome with scarce data on long-term outcomes among recovered Covid-19 patients of emerging economies. [8] [9]. We, therefore, planned to conduct this study to assess post-covid phenomenon or symptomatology in recovered Covid-19 patients in Delhi, India. The objective of this research was to determine the prevalence, pattern, and duration of symptoms related to Covid-19 recovered patients.

2 Methodology

3 Results

The study was conducted among 413 participants. The response rate was 379(91.76%) at the first follow-up and 369(89.34%) at the second follow-up. By the Per-Protocol principle, the analysis of the collected data is based on the second follow-up sample size (369). The mean age of the study participants is 42.07(14.89) years. The socio-demographic profile of the subjects concerning gender, educational status, history of smoking and alcohol consumption was studied. Nearly half (50.13%) of the participants were male, (97.84%) were literate, (92.96%) had never smoked and (9.21%) had a history of alcohol consumption. The majority of the (93.5%) participants were vaccinated and 26.56% had any co-morbidity (Table 1). There was a significant association of gender and age with the post-covid syndrome (<0.05).

Nearly half of the participants (47.5%) had Long Covid symptoms and (79.7%) had post-Covid symptoms. (Figure 1) The participants had a history of Joint Pain (36%), Persistent dry cough (35.7%), anxiousness (28.4%) and shortness of breath (27.1%). The other symptoms reported were persistent fatigue (21.6%), persistent headache (20%), forgetfulness (19.7%) and weakness in limbs (18.6%). (Table 2) The longest duration of symptom was observed in participants reporting anxiousness (138.75 ±54.14) followed by fatigue (137.57±48.33), shortness of breath (131.89±60.21) and joint pain/swelling (131.59±58.76). A prolonged duration of symptoms was also observed in patients with body pain (127.48±47.44), dry cough (121.01±56.48) and weakness in limbs (120.91±49.34). Anxiousness and persistent dry cough were significantly found to be of longer duration in males (p<0.05). Weakness in limbs and fever were observed to be of significantly longer duration among the vaccinated (p<0.05). The other reported symptoms reported were forgetfulness (116.47±52.86) and headache (114.74±42.68). The forgetfulness was seen to be of significantly longer duration among participants reporting any co-morbidity (Table 3).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1. Pattern of post-Covid symptoms (N=369)

The biochemical investigations were done for study participants at baseline, first follow-up and second follow-up. The Shapiro-Wilk test of normality presented the data to be skewed in the distribution of the biochemical parameters. Based on the data analyzed, there does not appear to be a significant difference in the median levels of TSH, HbA1c, AST/SGOT, ALT/SGPT, ALP, Creatinine, urea, and uric acid between individuals with Post Covid syndrome and those without. (p>0.05). The median values for all parameters were within the normal range and were comparable between the two groups. [Table 4] The new cases of raised HbA1C were detected in (3.5%) at the first follow-up and (6.9%) at the second follow-up. New cases of elevated TSH were observed in (9.2%) at the first follow-up and (6.6%) at the second follow-up. In the liver function tests, AST/SGOT was raised in (4.2%) of the participants at the first follow-up and (3.6%) at the second follow-up. The ALT/SGPT was elevated in (8.4%) of participants at the first follow-up and (4.8%) at the second follow-up. Furthermore, at the first follow-up, ALP was detected elevated in (12.6%) and at the second follow-up it was raised in (7.0%). Under the Kidney function test panel, the patients were investigated for Creatinine, urea and uric acid. Creatinine level was raised in (0.8%) at the first follow-up and (1.1%) at the second follow-up. Only (2.5%) reported elevated urea at the first follow-up and (1.6%) at the second follow-up. Likewise, just (1.9%) reported high uric acid levels at follow-up 1 and (1.4%) at follow-up 2.

The peripheral blood smear test was done for the patients at baseline, first and second follow-up. The presence of transformed lymphocytes and activated Monocytes was seen in (1.1%) of the participants at the first follow-up 1 and (0.8%) in the second follow-up. The Absolute Neutrophil Count was seen in the peripheral smear of (16.5%) at the first follow-up and (11.7%) at the second follow-up. The Absolute Eosinophil Count was reported in (7.9%) at the first follow-up and (4.6%) at the second follow-up. The ECG was reported as abnormal in (2.2%) of the participants at the first follow-up where blocks (37.5%), bradycardia (25%), low voltage complex (12.5%), Q wave (12.5%) and arrhythmia (12.5%) formed the diagnosis. No abnormality in ECG was reported at the second follow-up. At the first follow-up, (4.06%) of participants had abnormal chest X-ray findings. These findings were reported in the parenchymal (66.67%), pleural (26.67%) and mediastinal (6.66%) regions. At the second follow-up, (2.16%) had abnormal findings showing parenchymal (62.5%), pleural (12.5%) and mediastinal (25%) region involvement (Figure 2).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 2. Number of participants with ECG and Chest X-Ray abnormalities. (N=369)

4 Discussion

Our study provides insight into the symptomology which could develop in the long term in the Covid-19 diagnosed patients. To the best of our knowledge, ours represents one of the first community-based prospective cohort study to assess post-covid syndrome in India. In our cohort of participants, the prevalence of post covid syndrome was alarming with nearly two-third of the participants reporting one or more post covid symptoms. A similar finding was observed in a study conducted by Huang C in China in 2020 with nearly two-thirds (68%) of the participants reporting at least one post-covid 19 symptom.[12] Another prospective cohort study conducted by Sevalkumar J in 2020 in Norway observed nearly half (48.5%) of the participants with a post-covid syndrome which is lower than our estimate.[13] This could be due to the difference in age profile of the participants observed in the study which was 12-25 years and their study was conducted in Norway population with B.1.1.7 (Alpha) variant of SARS-CoV-2 dominant in the geographical area in 2020 whereas in our study Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 was predominant during the study period. Few other studies conducted globally with a similar objective found a higher prevalence of Post covid 19 in participants. [14, 15][Table 1]

In the study, (25.2%) of participants were diagnosed with one or more co-morbidity at baseline and (26.56%) at follow-up 2. A similar finding is observed in a study conducted by Menges D et al (2021) with (34%) of participants reporting at least one chronic comorbidity at baseline [16]. Our study reported (12.1%) with Hypertension and (9.7%) with Diabetes Mellitus. A similar study conducted by Cioboata R (2020) found (36%) of the participants with Hypertension and (14.52%) with Diabetes.[17] The difference could be due to alpha strain being reported in the latter study period. In the current study, (93.5%) of the participants were vaccinated (2 doses) at the time of baseline data collection. The finding is similar to the reported national data coverage of 90% (2022). There was no statistically significant difference found between the vaccination and unvaccinated cohort related to post-covid symptoms. [Table 1]

In our study, we found that there was no statistically significant difference in the LFT and KFT parameters between the groups of individuals who had Post Covid Syndrome and those who did not. The reported values were found to be comparable between the groups. Similar findings were observed in the study conducted by Alfadda A et al in 2019 to investigate the clinical and biochemical parameters in people who recovered from Covid 19 post 6 months. [18] In the current study, we found the lymphocyte counts to decrease from baseline to the second follow-up. Similar findings were observed in a study conducted by Gameil et al in 2021 to assess long-term biochemical residue after covid-19 recovery.[19] Similarly, in our study monocytes also declined in the participants with follow-up. A similar finding is seen in a study conducted by Ruenjaiman V et al to study the response of innate immune cells post-recovery from SARS-CoV-2 infection. [20] We found (4.06%) of participants with abnormal chest X-ray findings at the 3 months follow-up period. A study conducted by Fogante, M et al reported (50.4%) of the subjects reported chest X-rays abnormalities at 3 months follow-up which is higher than our reported result.[21] It’s possible that the differences in the findings are due to the methodology used. Specifically, the latter study focused on hospitalized patients may have produced different results than our study. In our study, only 2.2% of the participants reported ECG changes at the first follow-up and no changes in ECG were found at the second follow-up. A study was conducted by Øvrebotten et al. to assess the changes in cardiac structure and function 3-12 months after hospitalization for Covid-19. Regardless of the severity and persistent dyspnea, cardiac structure and function remained unchanged. [22]

There are a few limitations of our study. The non-availability of baseline clinical profiles of the study participants before Covid-19 infection was a major limitation. Second, as the participants have self-reported the symptoms experienced post covid, recall bias is possible. Third, in this study, we could not distinguish whether the post-covid symptoms were due to covid vaccination, re-infection of covid, or post-Covid syndrome. Fourth, even though we are assuming the omicron strain to be prevalent during the study period, we have no conclusive evidence for it.

5 Conclusion

Our study inferred that the clinical symptoms persist in participants until 6 months and a multi-system involvement is seen in the post-COVID period. Thus, the findings necessitate long-term, regular follow-ups. Since the post covid sequel of covid-19 is not explicit, it is important to continue studying the long-term effects of Covid-19 on the body to better understand how to treat and prevent Post Covid syndrome. In conclusion, our study suggests a comprehensive healthcare approach for the all-inclusive management of patients.

Statement and Declaration

Ethics Statement

The Institutional Ethics Committee, Maulana Azad Medical College and Associated Hospitals, New Delhi issued approval vide letter no F.1/IEC/MAMC/87/05/2021/No526). All the eligible study participants were informed about the purpose, risks and benefits of participating in the study. They were assured of complete confidentiality and were explained the option of withdrawing from the study at any point in time if they desire to do so. Written and informed consent was obtained from all the study participants. Participants were referred to Lok Nayak Hospital for medical/teleconsultation and follow-ups.

Consent for publication

Not Applicable

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

Authors contribution

All the authors contributed to the development of the Concept, literature search and design of the study. Nidhi Bhatnagar, MM Singh, Hitakshi Sharma, Gurmeet Singh, Suruchi Mishra, Shivani Rao and Amod Borle contributed to the data acquisition and analysis of the study. Suruchi Mishra, Hitakshi Sharma and Nidhi Bhatnagar prepared the manuscript. Nidhi Bhatnagar contributed to manuscript editing and MM Singh in review.