Abstract
Background We investigated systemic biochemical changes in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) by investigating the relationship between circulating plasma metabolites and both clinical and biomarker-assisted diagnosis of AD.
Methods We used an untargeted approach with liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry to measure exogenous and endogenous small molecule metabolites in plasma from 150 individuals clinically diagnosed with AD and 567 age-matched elderly without dementia of Caribbean Hispanic ancestry. Plasma biomarkers of AD were also measured including P-tau181, Aβ40, Aβ42, total tau, neurofilament light chain (NfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP). Association of individual and co-expressed modules of metabolites were tested with the clinical diagnosis of AD, as well as biologically-defined AD pathological process based on P-tau181 and other biomarker levels.
Results Over 4000 metabolomic features were measured with high accuracy. First principal component (PC) of lysophosphatidylcholines (lysoPC) that bind to or interact with docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and arachidonic acid (AHA) was associated with decreased risk of AD (OR=0.91 [0.89-0.96], p=2e-04). Restricted to individuals without an APOE ε4 allele (OR=0.89 [0.84-0.94], p= 8.7e-05), the association remained. Among individuals carrying at least one APOE ε4 allele, PC4 of lysoPCs moderately increased risk of AD (OR=1.37 [1.16-1.6], p=1e-04). Essential amino acids including tyrosine metabolism pathways were enriched among metabolites associated with P-tau181 levels and heparan and keratan sulfate degradation pathways were associated with Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio reflecting different pathways enriched in early and middle stages of disease.
Conclusions Our findings indicate that unbiased metabolic profiling can identify critical metabolites and pathways associated with β-amyloid and phosphotau pathology. We also observed an APOE ε4 dependent association of lysoPCs with AD and that biologically-based diagnostic criteria may aid in the identification of unique pathogenic mechanisms.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
EFIGA study is supported by NIA grants R56AG063908, R01AG067501 and RF1AG015473. We acknowledge the services of CEDIMAT for collaborating with sample collection and processing in the EFIGA cohort.
The metabolomics core that generated the metabolomics data for the project is supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences grant-5UL1TR001873.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
IRB of Columbia University Medical Center ethical approval for this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
