Abstract
Background Expanding free HIV testing service (HTS) access to include private clinics could increase testing rates. A donor funded programme, GP Care Cell, offered free HIV testing at selected private doctor-led clinics but uptake was low. We investigated whether HTS demand creation materials that used behavioural economics principles could increase demand for HIV testing at these clinics.
Methods We conducted a randomised controlled trial in Johannesburg, South Africa (January-April 2022) distributing brochures promoting HTS to adults in five private doctor-led clinic catchment areas. Individuals were randomised to receive three brochure types: (1) “Standard of care” (SOC) advertising a free HIV test and ART; (2) “Healthy lifestyle screening” promoted free low-cost health screenings in addition to HTS; and (3) “Recipient of care voucher” leveraged loss aversion and the endowment effect by highlighting the monetary value of free HTS. The primary outcome was presenting at the clinic following exposure to the brochures. Logistic regression compared outcomes between arms.
Results Of the 12,129 brochures distributed, 658 were excluded because of errors or duplicates and 11,471 were analysed. About 59% of brochure recipients were male and 50,3% were aged 25-34 years. In total, 448 (3.9%) brochure recipients presented at the private doctor-led clinics of which 50.7% were males. There were no significant differences in clinic presentation between the healthy lifestyle screening and SOC arm (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR] 1.02; 95% CI 0.79-1.32), and similarly between the recipient of care voucher and SOC arm (AOR 1.08; 95% CI 0.84-1.39). Individuals were more likely to attend clinics that were centrally located with visible branding for HTS (AOR=5.30; 95% CI: 4.14-6.79).
Conclusion Brochures that used behavioural insights did not increase demand for HTS at private doctor-led clinics. However, consistent distribution of the brochures may have potential to increase HIV testing uptake at highly visible private doctor-led clinics.
Trial registration SANCTR registration number: DOH-27-032022-9053
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
SANCTR registration number: DOH-27-032022-9053
Funding Statement
The GPCC was co-funded by the Gauteng Department of Health and through a sub-award under Anova Health Institute from their US Presidents Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) / United States Agency for International Development (USAID) APACE grant (Agreement Number 72067418CA00023). The study overlaid the existing GPCC investment through support from the University of Pennsylvania via a Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation grant (INV008318). LL was partially supported by the National Institute of Mental Health of the National Institutes of Health under grant number K01MH119923. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the funders or the United States Government.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The University of Witwatersrand Human Research Ethics Committee (Medical) (M210748) gave ethical approval for this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
List of abbreviations
- BE
- Behavioural economics
- FPD
- Foundation for Professional Development
- GPCC
- General Practitioners Care Cell
- HIV
- Human Immunodeficiency Virus
- HTS
- HIV Testing Services
- LMIC
- Low- and middle-income countries
- NHI
- National Health insurance
- RCT
- Randomised controlled trial
- SOC
- Standard of care
