Abstract
Background Little is known about the time required for primary care consultations, particularly those involving sick children in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This paper begins to fill that gap by providing evidence-based estimates of the time needed for initial visits with under-five infants and children at public or not-for-profit facilities in LMICs that use the Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI) clinical algorithm. The estimates are evidence-based and case-mix adjusted.
Methods The expected duration of IMCI consultations in any given setting is a function of the health issues presented by patients less than 5 years old, the kind and number of tasks health workers must perform to care for such patients, and the time required to complete those tasks. Determining the time needed to complete tasks with no minimum duration requires, in addition to tabulations of health issues and lists of tasks to be performed, information on rates of task performance and the mean observed duration of consultations. All this information was located, first, by searching MEDLINE, the database of the International Network for Rational Use of Medicines, the websites of the WHO and its regional offices, GOOGLE, and GOOGLE SCHOLAR using search terms such as ‘Integrated Management of Childhood Illness’, ‘observational’, ‘prospective’, ‘classification’, ‘clinical signs’, ‘health facility survey’, ‘validity’, ‘algorithm’, and ‘chart booklet’. Additional information was found by reviewing work that cited a qualified study and, conversely, material included in the bibliographies of qualified studies.
Results Estimates of the expected mean duration of initial consultations were constructed for 39 patient populations in 22 countries. The mean ranges from 17.1 to 20.5 minutes in the infant populations and from 15.5 to 26.4 minutes in the child populations. The shortest consultations range from 16.1 to 16.7 minutes in the infant populations and from 11.0 to 17.4 minutes in the child populations. The 98th percentile of expected durations ranges from 21.5 to 25.7 minutes in the infant populations and from 22.5 to 35.2 minutes in the child populations.
Conclusions IMCI consultations with infants and children presenting for the first time with a new concern require considerably more time than previously recognized. This suggests that the personnel costs of providing appropriate IMCI services may be substantial. It also confirms that the quality of most IMCI consultations is low.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study received no funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study did not involve human subjects, human All of the information used in the study came from published papers and/or public online sources (e.g. WHO Health Facility Survey reports). The studies in which the information was found are listed in the supplementary information (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.13915575): WORKBOOK S1_STUDIES USED.xlsx.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
This version of the manuscript reflects a series of minor cuts and new phrasings. The substance of the manuscript remains unchanged.
Data Availability
All data produced are available online at DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.13915575
