Abstract
Background Few studies have examined the time required for primary care consultations; none have focused on sick child visits in LMICs. This paper begins to fill that gap by providing evidence-based estimates of the time needed for initial visits with under-five infants and children at public or not-for-profit facilities in low- and middle-income countries that have adopted the Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI) clinical algorithm.
Method Estimates of the mean expected duration of IMCI consultations are based on (a) classification profiles, i.e., tabulations of the health issues presented by patients less than 5 years old; (b) lists of the tasks included in applicable versions of the IMCI algorithm and the conditions that elicit them, and (c) an estimate of the time needed to perform tasks with no pre-defined minimum duration. The latter requires, in addition to classification profiles, information on rates of task performance and the mean observed duration of consultations. I found such information by searching MEDLINE, the database of the International Network for Rational Use of Medicines, the websites of the WHO and its regional offices, GOOGLE, and GOOGLE SCHOLAR using search terms such as ‘Integrated Management of Childhood Illness’, ‘observational’, ‘prospective’, ‘classification’, ‘clinical signs’, ‘health facility survey’, and ‘validity’. I also reviewed studies that cited a qualified study and, conversely, material included in the bibliographies of qualified studies.
Results I have found or constructed classification profiles for 38 patient populations in 22 countries. The mean expected duration of consultations ranges from 16.3 to 18.7 minutes in the infant populations and from 16.7 to 27.6 minutes in the child populations. Largely because of mandatory tasks, the distributions of expected consultation durations are left-truncated. The shortest consultations range from 14.9 to 16.7 minutes in the infant populations and from 12.2 to 17.4 minutes in the child populations. One in 50 patients requires a consultation that, depending on the mix of cases in the patient population, exceeds the mean duration by 8.1 to 37.4 percent.
Conclusions IMCI consultations with infants and children presenting for the first time with a new concern require considerably more time than previously recognized. This confirms that the quality of most IMCI consultations is low and that the personnel costs of providing appropriate IMCI services are substantial. The steps required to produce estimates of the expected duration of IMCI consultations suggest that surveys designed to measure the effects of IMCI training must include tabulations of the gold standard classifications found in the patient populations.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study received no funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Emdadul Hoque DM, Arifeen SE, Rahman M, Chowdhury EK, Haque TM, Begum K, Hossain MA, Akter T, Haque F, Anwar T, Masum Billah Sk, Rahman AE, Hamidul Huque Md, Christou A, Baqui AH, Bryce J, Black RE. Improving and sustaining quality of child health care through IMCI training and supervision: experience from rural Bangladesh. International Health Planning and Policy, 2014; 29:753-762
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
I renamed the supplemental information files just before uploaded them to Zenodo. I subsequently became aware that this removed a series of links among the files. Those links have now been restored in DOI 10.5281/zenodo.8226243. I also became aware that 'check for lethargy' is not a mandatory task, as is often supposed, but is, in fact, conditional upon the patient not being 'visibly awake'.
Data Availability
All data produced are available online at DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.8226243
