Abstract
Functional and morphological architectures of major human organs have been well characterized using imaging biomarkers. Nevertheless, deciphering the causal relationships between imaging biomarkers and major clinical outcomes, as well as understanding the causal interplay across multiple organs, remains a formidable challenge. Mendelian randomization (MR) presents a framework for inferring causality by using genetic variants as instrumental variables. Here we report a systematic multi-organ MR analysis between 402 imaging biomarkers and 88 clinical outcomes. We identified 488 genetic causal links for 62 diseases and 130 imaging biomarkers from 9 organs, tissue, or systems, including the brain, heart, liver, kidney, lung, pancreas, spleen, adipose tissue, and skeleton system. We prioritized crucial intra-organ causal connections, such as the bidirectional genetic links between Alzheimer’s disease and brain function, as well as inter-organ causal effects, such as the adverse impact of heart diseases on brain health. Our findings uncover the genetic causal links spanning multiple organs, offering a more profound understanding of the intricate relationships between organ imaging biomarkers and clinical outcomes.
Medical images, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), provide noninvasive assessments of the health of major human organs, such as the brain, heart, liver, and kidney. Imaging biomarkers have been widely used in clinical research and applications. For example, Alzheimer’s disease-related abnormalities have been consistently observed in structural and functional imaging traits extracted from brain MRI, especially in the hippocampal region1. The cardiovascular MRI (CMR) provides reliable information on alterations in ventricular function, cardiovascular morphology, and myocardial perfusion, all of which are closely related to cardiovascular diseases2. Skeleton dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) helps discover novel genetic variants which influence the human skeletal form and uncover a major evolutionary aspect of human anatomical change to pathogenesis3. Several large-scale organ imaging datasets (on the scale of over 10,000 participants) have recently been made publicly available, revealing details about human organ morphology and function4–8. A variety of complex traits and clinical outcomes are found to be associated with organ imaging biomarkers based on these well-powered population-based studies9, 10. Despite these efforts, due to the inherent limitations of observational data, it remains challenging to definitively determine causal relationships between imaging biomarkers and clinical outcomes, as well as to fully understand the causal interconnections across multiple organs11.
By using genetic variants as instrumental variables, Mendelian randomization (MR) can infer causality from observational data12, 13. With assumptions regarding genetic, exposure, and outcome variables, MR aims to examine causal relationships between the exposure and the outcome variables while controlling for unwanted confounding factors. Family and population-based studies have shown that many imaging biomarkers and complex diseases are strongly influenced by genetics, with hundreds of associated genetic loci being identified in large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWAS)8, 14–29. Leveraging these GWAS summary-level data (summary statistics), MR methods can uncover causality between imaging measurements and clinical endpoints. Several recent MR studies have examined the genetic causality of imaging biomarkers11, 30–35. The major limitation of most of these MR studies has been focusing on one single organ (or imaging modality) and/or one single disease, or diseases in one single domain, such as brain imaging and psychiatric disorders30. It is known, however, that many diseases serve as the causes and/or consequences of functional and structural changes in multiple organs of the human body. Cross-organ analysis aids in understanding the complexity of human physiology, subsequently enhancing our ability to diagnose, treat, and prevent a variety of diseases. Therefore, MR analysis from a multi-organ perspective is needed to uncover the clinical implications of imaging biomarkers in the context of the complex interplays of organ systems.
In this paper, we performed a systematic two-sample MR analysis of multi-organ images and clinical endpoints. We aggregated GWAS summary statistics from 402 multi-organ imaging biomarkers (average sample size n ý 35,000) from the UK Biobank (UKB)36 study and 88 clinical outcomes (number of cases > 10,000) collected by the FinnGen project27 (Fig. S1 and Tables S1-S2). Specifically, we examined three major brain MRI modalities: 1) 101 regional brain volumes21 from brain structural MRI (sMRI); 2) 110 diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) parameters23 from brain diffusion MRI (dMRI); and 3) 90 functional activity (amplitude37) and connectivity traits from functional MRI (fMRI)25. In addition, we used 82 CMR traits extracted from short-axis, long-axis, and aortic cine cardiac MRI38, 39. We also evaluated 11 abdominal MRI biomarkers, which gauged the volume, fat, or iron content in seven organs and tissues8, as well as eight DXA imaging biomarkers that measured the lengths of all long bones and the width of the hip and shoulder29. The Methods section provides more details on these multi-organ imaging biomarkers. We applied 8 MR methods40–48 to explore the bidirectional genetic causal links. The study design is presented in Figure 1A and a high-level summary of our findings can be found in Figure 1B.
RESULTS
Genetic causality between brain imaging and multi-organ diseases
In this section, we examined the causal relationship between brain imaging biomarkers and multi-organ diseases. At the Bonferroni significance level (P < 5.18ξ10−6, multiple testing adjustment for both directions), MR suggested 127 significant genetic causal effects on 58 brain imaging biomarkers from 20 diseases in 8 major categories, including mental and behavioral disorders, diseases of the nervous system, diseases of the circulatory system, cardiometabolic endpoints, interstitial lung disease endpoints, diseases marked as autoimmune origin, diseases of the eye and adnexa, and diseases of the genitourinary system (Fig. S2 and Table S3). Among all the diseases, heart-related diseases were the most frequent (66/127) and were predominantly associated with DTI parameters and a smaller number of regional brain volumes. No significant causal effects were observed from heart diseases to fMRI traits. The top three heart diseases that exhibited causal genetic impacts on brain structures included peripheral artery disease (15/66), hypertension (14/66), and hypertensive diseases (12/66) (Figs. S2-S4). For example, peripheral artery disease played a causal role in altering the white matter microstructure within the anterior limb of the internal capsule (ALIC, |β|>0.15, P < 3.04ξ10−8), the body of corpus callosum tract (BCC, |β|>0.14, P < 8.44ξ10−7), and the genu of corpus callosum tract (GCC, |β|>0.13, P < 4.24ξ10−6). Hypertension and hypertensive diseases were causally associated with the superior corona radiata (SCR, |β|>0.07, P < 9.47ξ10−8). In addition to DTI parameters, hypertension also negatively affected the total grey matter volume (|β|>0.02, P < 1.26ξ10−8) (Figs. 2C and S2-S3). In addition to heart- related diseases, several other non-neurological clinical endpoints also influenced brain health. For example, negative causal effects of asthma were found on the SCR (|β|>0.05, P < 7.26ξ10−7) and volume of the right inferior lateral ventricle (|β|>0.09, P < 8.66ξ10−7) (Fig. S5).
Brain disorders also causally affected the brain imaging biomarkers (49/127), with dementia and Alzheimer’s disease being the most common brain-related diseases (Fig. S2). Interestingly, brain disorders were primarily associated with fMRI traits. For example, Alzheimer’s disease was consistently found to be causally related to decreased functional activity in the dorsal attention (|β|>0.04, P < 5.07ξ10−8), frontoparietal, and secondary visual network (|β|>0.04, P < 4.70ξ10-8), as well as DTI parameters of the SCR (|β|>0.03, P < 1.85ξ10−6) (Figs. 2A and S6). Both functional MRI and DTI parameters have been extensively used to study Alzheimer’s disease49. Abnormalities in white matter, such as those in the left SCR, as well as decreased functional connectivity in attention-related networks, have been identified in patients with Alzheimer’s disease50, 51. Similar to Alzheimer’s disease, dementia demonstrated negative causal genetic effects on functional activity in multiple networks, including the cingulo-opercular, default mode, dorsal attention, frontoparietal, language, posterior multimodal, and secondary visual networks (|β|>0.12, P < 4.74ξ10−8) (Figs. 2B and S7). In addition, mood disorders affected brain volume traits, such as the left and right putamen (|β|>0.04, P < 5.64ξ10−7) (Fig. S8). More results on causal genetic links from clinical endpoints to brain imaging traits were summarized in Figures S3-S9.
Brain and other organ diseases may also be caused by structural or functional changes in the brain. We investigated this direction by using brain imaging traits as exposure variables and clinical endpoints as the outcome variables. At the Bonferroni significance level (P < 5.18ξ10−6), we found 85 significant pairs between 22 brain imaging biomarkers and 20 clinical endpoints (Fig. S10 and Table S3). Most of the significant imaging-disease pairs were related to fMRI traits. Specifically, 66 of the 85 pairs were associated with fMRI traits, 10 with DTI parameters, and 9 with regional brain volumes. The majority of the significant findings were related to brain diseases (65/85), with a minor proportion linked to heart diseases (13/85), autoimmune diseases (4/85), COPD and related endpoints (1/85), diseases of the eye and adnexa (1/85), and diseases of the genitourinary system (1/85). For example, decreased activity in multiple functional networks was related to a higher risk of Alzheimer’s disease, such as the default mode and dorsal-attention networks (|β|>0.5, P < 5.65ξ10−13) (Figs. 3A and S11). We also identified genetic causal effects from DTI parameters on Alzheimer’s disease, such as the BCC and SCR (|β|>0.49, P < 6.79ξ10−7) (Figs. 3A and S11).
Dementia exhibited a similar pattern to Alzheimer’s disease, being causally influenced by decreased activity in multiple networks, such as the default mode, dorsal-attention, and secondary visual network (|β|>0.002, P < 2.77ξ10−7) (Fig. 3B and S12). fMRI traits, including the functional activity of the secondary visual network and functional connectivity of the default mode network, were also causally linked to other brain diseases, such as neuropsychiatric disorders (|β|>0.09, P<8.88ξ10−16) and neurological diseases (|β|>0.06, P < 1.72ξ10−6) (Figs. S13 and S14). Finally, we found that brain structural alterations may also influence other non-neurological diseases. For example, the left basal forebrain posed a negative causal effect on hypertensive diseases (|β|>0.12, P < 8.47ξ10−9) and hypertension (|β|>0.15, P < 6.19ξ10−11). The left lingual negatively affected female genital prolapse (|β|>0.75, P < 8.68ξ10−7).
Causal genetic relationships between CMR traits and clinical outcomes
We first examined the causal effects from clinical endpoints to CMR measures of heart structure and function. We identified 111 significant results at the Bonferroni significance level (P < 6.85ξ10−6), covering 41 unique CMR traits of the ascending aorta (AAo), descending aorta (DAo), left atrium (LA), and left ventricle (LV). Significant causal effects were found from 13 unique clinical endpoints in three categories: diseases of the circulatory system (8/13), cardiometabolic endpoints (4/13), as well as COPD and related endpoints (1/13). The majority of significant findings were related to heart-related diseases, with 66 out of 111 being diseases of the circulatory system and 44 out of 111 being cardiometabolic endpoints (Fig. S15 and Table S4).
The most frequently observed genetic effects were related to hypertensive diseases and hypertension (Figs. 4A and S16). Specifically, hypertensive diseases had negative causal effects on AAo and DAo distensibility (|β|>0.10, P < 1.26ξ10−7), whose genetic associations have been found in previous studies52–54. Hypertensive diseases also affected LV and LA traits, such as the global radial strain (|β|>0.06, P < 4.47ξ10−9), LA stroke volume (|β|>0.07, P < 3.04ξ10−8), and LV myocardial mass (|β|>0.11, P < 3.04ξ10−15). These findings were consistent with previous results derived from genetic association studies55, 56. Hypertension exhibited a similar pattern to hypertensive diseases, having a causal impact on various AAo and DAo traits, such as DAo distensibility, along with LA and LV traits, such as the LA minimum volume (LAmin volume, |β|>0.03, P < 7.11ξ10-6).
In addition, angina pectoris causally influenced AAo maximum and minimum areas (AAomax and AAomin areas, |β|>0.71, P < 1.44ξ10−7). The aortic aneurysm had a positive causal effect on DAo maximum and minimum areas (DAomax and DAomin areas, |β|>0.71, P < 1.63ξ10−24) and AAomax and AAomin areas (|β|>0.16, P < 2.22ξ10−6). These results align with clinical observations. Atrial fibrillation and flutter mainly affected LA traits, such as the LA ejection fraction (|β|>0.07, P < 5.88ξ10−8), LA maximum volume (LAmax volume, |β|>0.07, P < 1.62ξ10−6), and LAmin volume (|β|>0.08, P < 8.26ξ10−8). Atrial fibrillation is considered to result in a decrease in ejection fraction as well as an increase in LA volumes57, 58. In addition to heart-related diseases, COPD and related endpoints were
found to influence CMR traits, such as the negative effect of COPD on DAomax area (|β|>0.10, P < 4.45ξ10−11, and Fig. S16). Emphysema, a form of COPD distinguished by the degradation of lung tissue, may contribute to the dilatation of the thoracic aorta59. This could be attributed to emphysema’s involvement in the degradation of elastic fibers within the lungs, potentially triggering alterations in the aortic wall’s elasticity60. Such changes may precipitate the dilatation or ballooning of the thoracic aorta, thereby escalating the risk of both aortic aneurysm and abdominal aortic abnormalities59. This elucidates the potential biological mechanisms driving these causal relationships.
On the other hand, structural and functional irregularities of the heart may increase the risk of multi-organ diseases, given that the heart pumps blood to all other organs to maintain their functions61. We tested this direction by treating CMR traits as exposure variables and clinical endpoints as the outcomes. After Bonferroni adjustment (P < 6.85ξ10−6), we found 27 significant causal pairs, 25 for heart-related diseases and 2 for autoimmune diseases (Fig. S17 and Table S4). For example, global peak circumferential strain was positively linked to heart failure and antihypertensive medication (|β|>0.51, P < 8.49ξ10−8), while LV ejection fraction had a negative causal effect on these conditions (|β|>0.55, P < 1.12ξ10−6). In addition to heart-related diseases, heart structural changes affected diseases marked as autoimmune origin. For example, right ventricular end- systolic volume had a negative causal effect on the autoimmune diseases defined by Finngen27 (|β|>0.18, P < 3.10ξ10−6) (Figs. 4B and S18). In summary, we discovered causal relationships between CMR traits and heart-related diseases, which were typically bidirectional. Additionally, we revealed the inter-organ causal relationships between the heart and other organs.
Causal genetic links between abdominal imaging biomarkers and clinical outcomes
We first examined the effects of multi-organ diseases on abdominal imaging biomarkers, such as the volume or iron content of the spleen, kidney, liver, lung, and pancreas8. At the Bonferroni significance level (P < 6.69ξ10−5), we discovered 51 significant causal pairs from multi-organ diseases to abdominal imaging biomarkers, with liver imaging traits being the most impacted (26/51). Brain-related diseases were the most prevalent among all significant findings (35/51), followed by heart-related diseases (7/51), rheumatoid endpoints (4/51), diseases of the eye and adnexa (3/51), and autoimmune diseases (2/51) (Fig. S19 and Table S5). These findings were in line with ongoing research on the interplay between the brain and abdominal organs, such as the brain-gut connection62–64, brain- kidney connection65, 66, and brain-liver connection67.
Alzheimer’s disease and dementia were consistently found to be causally linked with various abdominal imaging biomarkers, such as the percent liver fat (|β|>0.37, P < 4.96ξ10−6), liver volume (|β|>0.03, P < 5.88ξ10−5), and adipose tissue measurement (|β|>0.06, P < 3.13ξ10−5). In addition to Alzheimer’s disease and dementia, there were multiple other brain-related diseases that may affect abdominal organs, including mental and behavioral disorders due to alcohol and psychoactive substance use, as well as sleep apnoea. For example, sleep apnoea influenced several abdominal traits, such as the liver volume (|β|>0.11, P < 2.80ξ10−5) and kidney volume (|β|>0.23, P < 2.57ξ10−6). Sleep apnea can lead to renal damage caused by ischemic stress, hemodynamic changes, or intermediary conditions such as hypertension, which can result in early chronic kidney disease68, 69. Multiple heart-related diseases also genetically impacted abdominal organs. For example, heart failure and antihypertensive medication can lead to larger spleen volume (|β|>0.004, P < 2.66ξ10−6). It has been found that heart splenic enlargement often results from blood stasis and right heart disease is often accompanied by splenomegaly70. Atherosclerosis was causally linked to the pancreas iron content, which was also supported by clinical evidence71, 72.
In addition to brain and heart-related diseases, we also observed causal effects from other diseases, such as autoimmune diseases on spleen volume and liver iron content. The spleen, as the largest immune organ in the body, can become enlarged because of various rheumatic and immune system diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematosus, Felty’s syndrome, sarcoidosis, and autoimmune hepatitis73–76. Liver iron content causally related to both autoimmune and rheumatological diseases (|β|>0.10, P < 3.02ξ10−5). It has been found that excessive deposition of iron ions exists in the affected tissues of autoimmune diseases, such as brain tissues of multiple sclerosis patients and synovial fluid of patients with rheumatoid arthritis77. Disorders of the choroid and retina, as well as the eye and adnexa diseases, were also found to be causally linked to liver iron content (|β|>0.10, P < 6.48ξ10−5, Figs. 5A and S20). Metal tends to accumulate in human ocular tissues, particularly in the choroid and retinal pigment epithelium78.
Next, we tested the opposite direction that abdominal imaging biomarkers being the exposure variables and multi-organ diseases being the outcomes. At the Bonferroni significance level (P < 6.69ξ10−5), we identified 55 significant pairs, with heart-related diseases being the most prevalent (34/55), followed by brain-related diseases (11/55), diseases marked as autoimmune origin (2/55), diseases of the eye and adnexa (5/55), and diseases of the genitourinary system (3/55) (Fig. S21 and Table S5). For example, pancreas fat causally affected the deep vein thrombosis of lower extremities and pulmonary embolism (|β|>0.38, P < 1.04ξ10−12). A reduction in pancreatic fat content may directly improve cellular function and insulin secretion rate, affecting triglyceride levels and blood flow79.
Larger liver, spleen, and kidney volumes were all causally linked to heart-related diseases (Fig. 5B and S22). Specifically, a larger liver volume was causally linked to hypertensive diseases and hypertension (|β|>0.13, P < 1.19ξ10−10); a larger kidney volume was causally related to a higher risk of stroke (|β|>0.25, P < 3.33ξ10−5); and a larger spleen volume had causal effects on various heart-related diseases, including coronary angioplasty (|β|>0.14, P < 4.94ξ10−7), coronary atherosclerosis (|β|>0.07, P < 6.94ξ10−10), and peripheral artery diseases (|β|>0.21, P < 4.98ξ10−5). In nephrotic syndrome, platelet over- activation and the use of diuretics and glucocorticoids can aggravate hypercoagulability. Therefore, kidney diseases, especially nephrotic syndrome, are prone to thrombotic and embolic complications, which can lead to stroke80–82. For brain-related disorders, we detected causal effects from liver volume to alcohol use disorder, as well as mental and behavioral disorders due to alcohol and psychoactive substance use. In addition, percent liver fat had causal links with Alzheimer’s disease, dementia, and psychiatric diseases. Previous studies have reported that non-alcoholic fatty liver disease contributes to neurological conditions like cognitive impairment and memory loss via insulin resistance and inflammation, along with excessive cytokine secretion83–86. In summary, we found that brain-related disorders result in alterations in abdominal organs. Furthermore, bidirectional relationships are observed in both neurodegenerative and psychiatric disorders. On the other hand, multiple abdominal organs are causally linked to heart- related diseases.
Causal genetic links between skeleton DXA traits and clinical outcomes
We first identified the causal effects of multiple organ diseases on DXA-derived skeleton traits3. At the Bonferroni significance level (P < 3.39ξ10−5), we found strong evidence that multi-organ diseases affected the human skeleton health, where heart-related diseases (6/12) and diseases of the nervous system (4/12) were the majority, as well as rheumatic disease (1/12) and diseases of the genitourinary system (1/12) (Fig. S23 and Table S6). Carpal tunnel syndrome (|β|>0.0007, P < 6.25ξ10−8) and sleep apnoea (|β|>0.001, P < 6.35ξ10−8) were causally related to higher average forearm length. Carpal tunnel syndrome is when the median nerve (nerve from the forearm to the palm of the hand) becomes pressed or squeezed, which affects the wrist-to-forearm ratio87, 88. It has been observed that oral appliance therapy89, which is an effective treatment of sleep apnea, is associated with skeletal changes90. Furthermore, the nerve, nerve root, and plexus disorders were causally linked with higher average tibia length (|β|>0.001, P < 2.78ξ10- 5), which was consistent with the previous finding that a specific type of plexus disorder, lumbosacral plexus disorder, is associated with lower leg91. Heart-related diseases also had causal effects on several DXA traits. For example, coronary heart disease had a negative causal effect on the average tibia length (|β|>0.0002, P < 2.50ξ10−5) and a positive causal effect on the hip width (|β|>0.0004, P < 1.68ξ10−5). Additionally, gonarthrosis affected the average tibia length (|β|>0.0005, P < 1.69ξ10−5) (Figs. 6A and S24).
The skeletal system serves as the foundational support for the human body, and therefore, skeletal abnormalities may potentially contribute to risk of multi-organ diseases. We identified 17 causal pairs at the Bonferroni significance level (P < 3.39ξ10−5). More than half (10/17) of these results were related to the heart, and the rest were rheumatic disease (3/17), diseases of the eye and adnexa (2/17), interstitial lung diseases (1/17), and diseases of the genitourinary system (1/17) (Fig. S23 and Table S6). Average tibia length was causally linked to coxarthrosis (|β|>30.03, P < 3.11ξ10−9), gonarthrosis (|β|>19.39, P < 3.18ξ10−7), and other rheumatological endpoints (|β|>13.12, P < 2.74ξ10−5). It has been found that the leg length discrepancy could lead to lower limb biomechanics, such as gonarthrosis, coxarthrosis, and other lower limb symptoms92, 93. Torso length causally affected heart-related issues, such as coronary angioplasty (|β|>38.85, P < 9.45ξ10−5), coronary atherosclerosis (|β|>22.94, P < 1.22ξ10−5), hard cardiovascular diseases (|β|>18.12, P<1.30ξ10−5), and ischemic heart diseases (|β|>30.99, P < 1.33ξ10−5). Previous studies examining the relationship between skeletal length and heart diseases have primarily focused on leg length or overall body height, generally reporting negative associations94, 95. Consistent with these associations, we found that a long torso can lead to a higher risk of heart disease. We also observed higher average tibia length to be causally linked to a lower risk of hypertension (|β|>6.46, P < 1.27ξ10−7), which was in line with previous findings96 (Figs. 6B and S25). In conclusion, we found that rheumatoid endpoints (such as gonarthrosis) and diseases of the nervous system (such as nerve, nerve root, and plexus disorders) had a significant impact on bone health. Conversely, skeletal traits, like torso length, demonstrated a causal link with heart diseases.
Discussion
Observational studies have established numerous links between various imaging-derived phenotypes and clinical outcomes. However, these associations are frequently influenced by residual confounding, complicating the accurate inference of causal effect sizes 97. MR allows for the inference of causal relationships between exposure and outcome variables. MR leverages the natural and random assortment of genetic variants during meiosis, making these variants an ideal choice as instrumental variables to discern causal effects. In the present study, we evaluated the causal relationship between 402 multi-organ imaging biomarkers and 88 clinical outcomes through bidirectional MR. To avoid the issue of sample overlap98, which may bias the causal effect and has sometimes been overlooked in many current MR-based studies, we used a two-sample MR design and sourced our imaging and clinical data from different large-scale cohorts.
It is widely understood that diseases often affect more than just one part of the human body, given the interdependent nature of our organ systems for overall body function. The brain and heart are particularly important among all organs, as the brain manages a range of functions, including reactions, emotions, vision, memory, and cognition99, 100 while the heart serves as the engine of the body, pumping life-sustaining blood through a network of arteries and veins to supply other organs with the oxygen and nutrients they need. Dysfunctions in various organs can potentially have adverse effects on the brain and heart. Similarly, abnormalities within the brain and heart can result in dysfunction in other parts of the body. Our results support the presence of robust bidirectional interactions between the brain and heart with other organs. In addition to the connections to the brain and heart, we also discovered many other causal relationships for other organs. The interaction plot across different organ systems can be found in Figure 1B. Below we provide more detailed discussions of these specific findings.
Intra-brain causal connections
Variations in brain structure and function were closely linked with brain disorders, with parts of these relationships appearing to be bidirectional. We consistently found causal links between brain imaging biomarkers and multiple psychiatric disorders or neurological diseases, such as Alzheimer’s disease, dementia, mood disorder, and sleep apnea. For example, Alzheimer’s disease and dementia had bidirectional causal links with fMRI traits and DTI parameters. Previous studies have consistently shown that resting fMRI connectivity patterns are altered in patients with Alzheimer’s disease101, 102, especially in brain regions involved in memory and cognitive function103, 104.
Brain-heart causal connections
While association studies have been investigating the brain-heart interaction39, 105, the causal genetic links within these heart-brain systems remain largely unexplored. We discovered causal connections from several heart-related diseases such as hypertension, hypertensive diseases, heart failure, and peripheral artery disease to DTI parameters in white matter tracts such as the SCR, ALIC, BCC, GCC, the splenium of corpus callosum, and the retrolenticular part of the internal capsule (RLIC). Additionally, these diseases were also linked to regional brain volumes, such as grey matter and left amygdala. Hypertension can lead to damage of the blood vessels in the brain106, which can in turn lead to a reduction in the volume of grey matter in certain brain regions107. This may result in cognitive impairment and an increased risk of developing dementia. Therefore, effective management of hypertension through lifestyle changes and medication can help reduce the risk of these negative effects on the brain. On the other hand, alterations in brain structure, such as deformations in the left ventral DC and left basal forebrain, were found to contribute to heart-related diseases like hypertension. Similarly, changes in the left superior temporal region were linked to heart failure. These could be attributed to the brain’s essential function in controlling blood pressure via a sophisticated network that involves multiple regions and pathways108, 109.
Bidirectional connections between the brain and abdominal organs
Brain abnormalities affected multiple abdominal organs and the skeletal system. For example, Alzheimer’s disease and dementia causally affected the percent liver fat, and neurological diseases (defined by FinnGen27) had a positive causal effect on lung volume. It has been found that neurological diseases, such as multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and Huntington’s disease, can cause respiratory muscle weakness110, 111, which can affect lung volume and function. We also found sleep apnoea may lead to larger spleen and kidney volume. This may be due to the increased workload on the spleen to filter blood and remove damaged red blood cells. Additionally, the low oxygen levels associated with sleep apnea can lead to an increase in the number of red blood cells in the body, which can also contribute to splenomegaly and a change in kidney volume. Sleep apnea was causally associated with increased pancreas iron content, potentially due to the decreased oxygen levels that accompany sleep apnea, resulting in increased iron absorption in the body. The excess iron in the pancreas can lead to oxidative stress and inflammation112, 113, which can contribute to the development of pancreatic damage and dysfunction114–116.
In addition to the aforementioned neurological diseases, we also discovered that mental and behavioral disorders attributed to alcohol can lead to an increase in percent liver fat. It has been found that people with alcohol use disorder are more likely to develop alcoholic fatty liver disease117. Besides brain-related diseases, brain structural alternations could also lead to a higher risk of diseases of other organs. For example, right postcentral was causally linked to COPD. Some studies have suggested that chronic stress and anxiety, which are associated with changes in brain structure, may contribute to the development or worsening of respiratory conditions such as COPD118, 119.
On the other hand, brain imaging biomarkers or disorders were causally affected by several diseases of other organs or systems. A high percent liver fat resulted in a lower risk of Alzheimer’s disease and dementia. Previous studies120, 121 have reported associations between the two and our results aligned with the most recent study122. More work is needed to understand the underlying pathophysiological mechanism. Brain imaging biomarkers were affected by multi-organ diseases, but some of them may affect the brain indirectly, such as through mediating effects of anxiety and depression. For example, diseases of the genitourinary system (ovarian cyst and menorrhagia) causally affected brain structural features. Ovarian cysts can cause hormonal imbalances due to the production of hormones by the cysts themselves123. These hormonal imbalances can cause a range of symptoms, such as mood swings, anxiety, and depression124, which can affect brain function and emotional regulation. Diseases of the eye and adnexa (conjunctivitis) had genetic causal effects on functional connectivity traits. Conjunctivitis can be caused by a viral or bacterial infection, which can potentially lead to cause systemic inflammation in the body125. Systemic inflammation has been linked to changes in brain function and structure and may affect brain fMRI traits126, 127.
In addition, asthma influenced regional brain volumes. One prevalent way in which asthma impacts the brain is via the emotional and psychological stress associated with managing a chronic illness. Anxiety, stress, and depression, often faced by individuals with asthma, can induce alterations in brain structure. Previous studies have shown that individuals with asthma may have reduced cognitive function, including impaired memory and attention, and changes in brain activity patterns during cognitive tasks128, 129. Last but not least, autoimmune diseases (defined by FinnGen27) affected brain imaging biomarkers, such as DTI parameters of the RLIC and SCR. Multiple sclerosis is an autoimmune disease that affects the central nervous system, and the damage to the myelin sheath that surrounds axons can occur in various regions of the brain130, 131, including the internal capsule. The damage can cause disruptions in the neural connections passing through the anterior limb, leading to symptoms such as weakness, spasticity, and difficulty with balance and coordination. In some rare autoimmune diseases, such as neuromyelitis optica132 and autoimmune encephalitis, inflammation and damage can occur in the brain.
The resulting neurological symptoms can vary depending on the severity and location of the damage133, 134. Furthermore, autoimmune diseases that cause systemic inflammation, such as rheumatoid arthritis and lupus, which can potentially affect the brain135 and white matter tracts136, 137. Chronic inflammation can lead to changes in the microstructure of white matter tracts, which can result in alterations in neural connectivity and function138, 139.
Intra-heart causal connections
Bidirectional causal relationships were identified between heart-related diseases and CMR traits. Hypertension and hypertensive diseases were found to causally influence several CMR traits across various heart chambers and aorta regions. Conversely, variations in CMR traits were observed to potentially lead to heart diseases. These findings are in accordance with existing clinical evidence. For example, hypertension can cause the LA to enlarge, a condition known as left atrial hypertrophy140, 141. This enlargement can lead to several complications, including atrial fibrillation, heart failure, and stroke142. As for atrial fibrillation, the electrical signals that control the heartbeat become chaotic, causing the heart to beat irregularly and often too fast. Over time, the constant irregularity of the heartbeat can also cause the LA to enlarge and weaken143.
Bidirectional connections between the heart and abdominal organs
Heart diseases and various multi-organ imaging biomarkers were causally related. For instance, heart failure was found to cause an increase in spleen volume. When the heart is not able to pump blood effectively, it can cause an increase in the pressure from the veins to the spleen. This increased pressure can cause the spleen to enlarge, a condition known as splenomegaly144. In addition, the backup of blood in the liver that can occur with heart failure can also contribute to the development of splenomegaly. Larger spleen volume can conversely lead to heart failure. An enlarged spleen can increase the workload on the heart, leading to further worsening of heart failure symptoms.
Pancreas was also found to have a causal effect on the heart. For example, excess pancreas fat was found to cause a higher risk of developing deep vein thrombosis of lower extremities and pulmonary embolism. Pancreatic steatosis is a condition where fat accumulates in the pancreas. This is associated with a number of metabolic abnormalities, including insulin resistance and inflammation, which can contribute to the development of cardiovascular disease145, 146. The inflammatory and procoagulant effects of excess pancreatic fat could potentially contribute to an increased risk of deep vein thrombosis.
The heart and lungs are closely connected and work together as part of the cardiovascular system. The lungs are responsible for taking in oxygen from the air we breathe and transferring it into the bloodstream, while the heart pumps the oxygen-rich blood throughout the body to nourish cells and tissues. We found strong evidence of causal links from COPD and CMR traits of DAo. The degradation of elastic fibers through proteolysis is a characteristic of emphysema147, which can potentially lead to the enlargement of the thoracic aorta.
Spleen, as the largest immune organ, is closely related with diseases marked as autoimmune origin. We found strong evidence showing the genetic causal relationship between spleen volume and autoimmune diseases (defined by Finngen27), such as rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and systemic sclerosis. It has been reported that autoimmune diseases can affect the spleen. For instance, conditions like lupus or rheumatoid arthritis can lead to splenomegaly, a condition often triggered by inflammation or the accumulation of abnormal immune cells in the spleen148, 149.
Skeleton DXA traits
We also found genetic causal links between skeleton DXA traits and multiple organ diseases. Skeleton traits were causally affected by diseases of the nervous system, rheumatic disease, as well as nerve, nerve root and plexus disorders. Heart diseases may also impact the skeletal system by influencing bone health. It has been observed that individuals with heart disease, especially those with heart failure, have an increased risk of osteoporosis and bone fractures149, 150. This may be due to a variety of factors. For example, some medications used to treat heart diseases, such as diuretics and steroids, can also increase the risk of osteoporosis151. Additionally, individuals with heart disease may have reduced mobility and physical activity, which can lead to decreased bone density and strength152. Skeleton problems could also inversely contribute to numerous organ diseases, with heart conditions being the most prevalent in our analysis. A long torso may lead to a high risk of coronary heart disease. We also noted that a higher average tibia length was causally associated with a lower risk of hypertension, a finding that aligns with clinical observations96.
Limitations and conclusions
Our study has several limitations. First, we collected GWAS summary statistics from publicly available databases, meaning that we were not able to evaluate the impact of unobserved confounders (such as population stratification) on our results. Second, one common limitation of most existing MR methods is that they require several model assumptions, and thus may suffer from model misspecifications and data heterogeneity issues when integrating data from different data resources153. We have systematically applied quality control measures and conducted sensitivity analyses in our study. Future research implementing more advanced MR methods may relax some of the model assumptions the current MR methods have made154, 155. Furthermore, MR studies are designed to examine the effects of lifetime exposure factors on outcomes, not interventions within a specified period. As such, our findings may have different interpretations from rigorous results obtained from randomized controlled trials. Therefore, any clinical interventions based on these MR findings should be undertaken with caution.
In conclusion, we used two-sample bidirectional MR analyses to comprehensively explore the multi-organ causal connections between 88 clinical outcomes and 402 image-derived phenotypes of various organ systems. Our results revealed robust genetic evidence supporting causal connections within and across multiple organs. This will aid in unraveling complex pathogenic mechanisms and will contribute to the early prediction and prevention of multi-organ diseases from a whole body perspective.
METHODS
Multi-organ imaging biomarkers
The imaging data were sourced from the UK Biobank (UKB) study, which enrolled approximately 500,000 individuals aged between 40 and 69 from 2006 to 2010 (https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/). These multi-organ imaging data were collected from the ongoing UKB imaging study project (https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/explore-your-participation/contribute-further/imaging-study), which aims to collect brain, heart, and abdomen scans from 100,000 participants. Ethical approval for the UKB study was secured from the North West Multicentre Research Ethics Committee (approval number: 11/NW/0382).
Studies of brain and heart diseases usually rely on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, which are well-established clinical endophenotypes. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is a set of MRI techniques that are designed to assess ventricular function, cardiovascular morphology, myocardial perfusion, and other cardiac functional and structural features156, 157. They have been frequently used to reveal heart- related issues clinically. The CMR traits used in the paper were originally generated from the raw short-axis, long-axis, and aortic cine images using the state-of-the-art heart imaging segmentation and feature representation framework38, 158, 159. We divided the generated 82 CMR traits into 6 categories. The first two are aortic sections, namely ascending aorta (AAo) and descending aorta (DAo), which serve as the main ‘pipe’ in supplying blood to the entire body. The other four are the global measures of 4 cardiac chambers, including the left ventricle (LV), right ventricle (RV), left atrium (LA), and right atrium (RA), which altogether manage the heartbeat and blood flow. There are also some other traits, such as regional phenotypes of the left ventricle myocardial-wall thickness and strain (Table S1). The summary-level GWAS data of these 82 CMR traits were obtained from Zhao, et al. 39.
Brain MRI provides detailed information about brain structure and function160, such as abnormal growth, healthy aging, white matter diseases, structural issues, and functional abnormalities. In this paper, the summary-level GWAS data were collected from recent multi-modal image genetic studies, including regional brain volumes from structural MRI21, 161 (sMRI), diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) parameters from diffusion MRI23, 162 (dMRI), and functional activity (that is, amplitude37) and functional connectivity phenotypes from resting functional MRI25 (resting fMRI). In sMRI, we used ANTs163 to generate regional brain volumes for cortical and subcortical regions and global brain volume measures. In dMRI, we used the ENIGMA-DTI pipelines164, 165 to generate tract-averaged parameters for fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, axial diffusivity, radial diffusivity, and mode of anisotropy in major white matter tracts and across the whole brain. For resting fMRI, we extracted phenotypes from brain parcellation-based analysis. We used the Glasser360 atlas166, which divided the cerebral cortex into 360 regions in 12 functional networks167. We considered 90 network-level resting fMRI phenotypes that evaluated interactions and spontaneous neural activity at rest.
The 11 imaging biomarkers from abdominal MRI were derived by Liu., et al8 using deep learning methods in terms of volume, fat, and iron in several organs and tissues, such as the liver, spleen, kidney, lung, pancreas, and adipose tissue. Skeleton DXA traits, including all long bone lengths as well as hip and shoulder width, were derived by Kun., et al3 using deep learning methods on whole-body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) images.
All eight skeleton traits have been controlled for height. The heritability of the above imaging biomarkers can be found in Supplementary Note.
FinnGen clinical endpoints
We used 88 clinical endpoints collected by the FinnGen project, which were selected from the R7 release and with more than 10,000 cases for most of the clinical endpoints (https://www.finngen.fi/en/access_results). As for some important diseases, such as Alzheimer’s disease, we set the cutoff of the number of cases to be 6,000. The 88 clinical endpoints covered diseases from various categories, namely, mental and behavioral disorders, diseases of the nervous system, diseases of the eye and adnexa, diseases of the genitourinary system, diseases of the circulatory systems, cardiometabolic endpoints, diseases marked as autoimmune origin, rheuma endpoints, interstitial lung diseases, COPD and related endpoints, as well as some unclassified endpoints. The definations can be found at https://risteys.finregistry.fi/. The FinnGen data used in our study was obtained from separate cohorts than those supplying imaging traits, which were derived from the UKB study, thus ensuring there was no sample overlap. Detailed information of these 88 clinical variables can be found in Table S2.
Mendelian randomization analysis
We examined the genetic causal relationships between the 402 imaging traits (101 brain regional volume traits, 110 brain DTI parameters, 90 network-level fMRI phenotypes, 82 CMR traits, 11 abdominal traits, and 8 skeleton DXA traits) and 88 clinical endpoints. Prior to conducting the Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis, we conducted standard preprocessing and quality control procedures. First, we selected genetic variants based on a significance threshold of 5×10−8 in the exposure GWAS data. To ensure the independence of the genetic variants used in MR, we implemented LD clumping with a window size of 10,000 and an r2 threshold of 0.01, using the 1000 Genomes European ancestry data as a reference panel. We used the TwoSampleMR package (https://mrcieu.github.io/TwoSampleMR/) for harmonization, which enabled us to accurately align alleles between the selected variants in the exposure and the reported effect on the outcome.
We assessed the performance of 8 MR methods, which included Inverse variance weighted (fixed effect), Inverse variance weighted (multiplicative random effect), MR- Egger, Simple Median, Weighted Median, Weighted Mode, DIVW, GRAPPLE, and MR- RAPS40, 41, 43–48, 168, where MR Egger was used as the pleiotropy test. To ensure the reliability of our results, we implemented several quality control procedures. We excluded causal estimates that relied on fewer than 6 genetic variants, as a larger number of genetic variants increases the statistical power of MR analysis46, 47. We retained causal pairs that were significant in at least two out of the eight methods. We also screened for pleiotropy by using the MR-Egger intercept, the most used method for testing the pleiotropy assumption. If a causal estimate failed the MR-Egger intercept test, we required that it have significant results in at least one of the robust MR methods, such as Weighted Median, Weighted Model, MR-RAPS, or GRAPPLE. Out of 488 significant findings, 81 causal estimates failed the MR-Egger intercept test. However, when we interpreted the results, we focused on the ones that passed the MR-Egger intercept test.
Code availability
We made use of publicly available software and tools. Our analysis code will be made freely available at Zenodo.
Data availability
We used summary-level GWAS data in this study, which can be obtained from the FinnGen project (https://www.finngen.fi/en/access_results), BIG-KP (https://bigkp.org/), Heart-KP (https://heartkp.org/), and project-specific resources detailed in Liu., et al8 and Kun., et al3. Our multi-organ MR results can be explored at https://mr4mo.org/.
Data Availability
We used summary-level GWAS data in this study, which can be obtained from the FinnGen project (https://www.finngen.fi/en/access_results), BIG-KP (https://bigkp.org/), Heart-KP (https://heartkp.org/), and project-specific resources detailed in Liu., et al and Kun., et al. Our multi-organ MR results can be explored at https://mr4mo.org/
METHODS
Methods are available in the Methods section.
Note: One supplementary pdf file and one supplementary table zip file are available.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
J.S. and B.Z. designed the study. J.S., R.Z., C.C., B.L., Z. F., X.Y., Y.Y, X.W., and Y.L. analyzed the data. B.X., T.L., and H.Z. provided feedback on the results. J.S. and B.Z. wrote the manuscript with feedback from all authors.
CORRESPONDENCE AND REQUESTS FOR MATERIALS should be addressed to H.Z. and B.Z.
COMPETING FINANCIAL INTERESTS
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The study has been partially supported by funding from the Wharton Dean’s Research Fund and Analytics at Wharton, as well as start-up funds from Purdue Statistics Department. This research has been conducted using summary-level data from the UK Biobank study and FinnGen research project. We would like to thank the individuals who represented themselves in the UK Biobank and FinnGen studies for their participation and the research teams for their efforts in collecting, processing, and disseminating these datasets. We would like to thank the research computing groups at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Purdue University, and the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania for providing computational resources and support that have contributed to these research results.
REFERENCES
- 1.↵
- 2.↵
- 3.↵
- 4.↵
- 5.↵
- 6.↵
- 7.
- 8.↵
- 9.↵
- 10.↵
- 11.↵
- 12.↵
- 13.↵
- 14.↵
- 15.
- 16.
- 17.
- 18.
- 19.
- 20.
- 21.↵
- 22.
- 23.↵
- 24.
- 25.↵
- 26.
- 27.↵
- 28.
- 29.↵
- 30.↵
- 31.
- 32.
- 33.
- 34.
- 35.↵
- 36.↵
- 37.↵
- 38.↵
- 39.↵
- 40.↵
- 41.↵
- 42.
- 43.
- 44.
- 45.
- 46.↵
- 47.↵
- 48.↵
- 49.↵
- 50.↵
- 51.↵
- 52.↵
- 53.
- 54.↵
- 55.↵
- 56.↵
- 57.↵
- 58.↵
- 59.↵
- 60.↵
- 61.↵
- 62.↵
- 63.
- 64.↵
- 65.↵
- 66.↵
- 67.↵
- 68.↵
- 69.↵
- 70.↵
- 71.↵
- 72.↵
- 73.↵
- 74.
- 75.
- 76.↵
- 77.↵
- 78.↵
- 79.↵
- 80.↵
- 81.
- 82.↵
- 83.↵
- 84.
- 85.
- 86.↵
- 87.↵
- 88.↵
- 89.↵
- 90.↵
- 91.↵
- 92.↵
- 93.↵
- 94.↵
- 95.↵
- 96.↵
- 97.↵
- 98.↵
- 99.↵
- 100.↵
- 101.↵
- 102.↵
- 103.↵
- 104.↵
- 105.↵
- 106.↵
- 107.↵
- 108.↵
- 109.↵
- 110.↵
- 111.↵
- 112.↵
- 113.↵
- 114.↵
- 115.
- 116.↵
- 117.↵
- 118.↵
- 119.↵
- 120.↵
- 121.↵
- 122.↵
- 123.↵
- 124.↵
- 125.↵
- 126.↵
- 127.↵
- 128.↵
- 129.↵
- 130.↵
- 131.↵
- 132.↵
- 133.↵
- 134.↵
- 135.↵
- 136.↵
- 137.↵
- 138.↵
- 139.↵
- 140.↵
- 141.↵
- 142.↵
- 143.↵
- 144.↵
- 145.↵
- 146.↵
- 147.↵
- 148.↵
- 149.↵
- 150.↵
- 151.↵
- 152.↵
- 153.↵
- 154.↵
- 155.↵
- 156.↵
- 157.↵
- 158.↵
- 159.↵
- 160.↵
- 161.↵
- 162.↵
- 163.↵
- 164.↵
- 165.↵
- 166.↵
- 167.↵
- 168.↵