Abstract
Introduction Community health workers are essential to frontline health outreach throughout low- and middle-income countries, including programming for early childhood immunization. The World Health Organization estimates a projected shortage of 18 million health workers by 2030. Understanding how community health workers are engaged for successful early childhood vaccination among countries who showed success in immunization coverage would support evidence-based policy guidance across contexts. To that end, we identified factors of community health worker programs that contributed to improved vaccination coverage in Nepal, Senegal, and Zambia.
Methods We conducted interviews and focus group discussions at the national, regional, district, health facility, and community levels of the health systems of Nepal, Senegal, and Zambia, and used thematic analysis to investigate contributing factors of community health worker programming that supported early childhood immunization within each country and across contexts. We developed a model that could be used for assessment and adaptation based on lessons learned.
Findings Across all countries, implementation of vaccination programming relied principally on the 1) organization, 2) motivation, and 3) trust of community health workers. Organization was accomplished by expanding cadres of community health workers to carry out their roles and responsibilities related to vaccination. Motivation of community health workers was supported by intrinsic and extrinsic incentives. Trust was expressed by communities due to community health worker respect and value placed on work.
Conclusion Improvements in immunization coverage followed successful community health worker programs, facilitated by diversification of cadres, roles and responsibilities, motivation, and trust. With the continued projection of health worker shortages, especially in low-income countries, community health workers bridged the equity gap in access to vaccination services by enabling wider reach to minority populations and populations in hard-to-reach areas. Although improvements in vaccination programming were seen in all three countries - including government - commitment to addressing human resource deficits, training and renumeration; workload, low and inconsistent compensation, inconsistency in training duration and scope, and supervision are still major challenges to immunization programming. Vaccination and health decision-makers should consider organization, motivation, and trust of community health workers to improve the implementation of immunization programming.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA (OPP1195041) with a planning grant from Gates Ventures, LLC, Kirkland, WA. MCF and RAB received the award. No commercial companies funded the study nor the authors. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is a non-profit and Gates Ventures is a venture capital firm. None of the authors received salaries from commercial companies. URLs to sponsors' websites is https://www.gatesfoundation.org/. Bill &Melinda Gates Foundation had no explicit say in the design, data collection, analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript. However, BMGF and GV were engaged in the project process, provided context, when necessary, but all research activities and publications are solely those of the authors.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was considered exempt by the Institutional Review Board committee of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA (IRB00111474), and was approved by the National Health Research Committee (NHRC Reg. no. 347/2019) in Kathmandu, Nepal the National Ethical Committee for Health Research (CERNS Comité National d’Ethique pour la Recherche en Santè) in Dakar, Senegal (00000174) the University of Zambia Biomedical Research Ethics Committee (Federal Assurance No. FWA00000338, REF. No. 166-2019) and the National Health Research Authority in Zambia.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data are available from the Open Science Framework website (https://osf.io/7ys4a/?view_only=739ca7a72f9749118b4aa3d2f7b655d9).
https://osf.io/7ys4a/?view_only=739ca7a72f9749118b4aa3d2f7b655d9
