ABSTRACT
Background The World Health Organization (WHO) describes Monkeypox as a viral zoonosis, or an animal-to-human virus transmission, with symptoms comparable to those of past smallpox patients but clinically less severe. This study’s objective is to assess the results of previous investigations on the best drug combinations for treating Monkeypox.
Method The pharmacological combinations used to treat monkeypox sickness have been researched in two stages for this systematic review and network meta-analysis. To begin with, a certain machine learning technique is used to extract the medication combinations from the researched articles offered on science databases, including Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science (ISI), Science Direct, Embase, and Google Scholar. Second, the tested medicine combinations will have been proven.
Results The results of this study show that the p-value between the proposed drug combination and Monkeypox for scenarios 1 to 5 were 0.108, 0.042, 0.023, 0.018, and 0.015, respectively. Scenario i is the combination of the first i suggested drugs for treating Monkeypox. This has led to a 720 percent increase in the proposed drug combination’s efficacy in treating Monkeypox.
Conclusion The suggested drug combination decreases the p-value between MonkeyPox and the genes as potential targets for Monkeypox progression, which leads to an improvement in the treatment of Monkeypox. Therefore, using the right combination of drugs is important in improving the community’s health and reducing per capita treatment costs.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Protocols
https://academic.oup.com/biomethods/article/8/1/bpac038/6989630
Funding Statement
Not applicable
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Not applicable
Abbreviations
- STROBE
- Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology;
- PRISMA
- Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis
- RAIN
- Systematic Review and Artificial Intelligence Network Meta-Analysis
