Abstract
Background Current medicine falls short at providing systematic data-driven guidance to individuals and care providers. While an individual’s medical history is the foundation for every medical decision in clinical practice and is routinely recorded in most health systems, the predictive potential and utility for most human diseases is largely unknown.
Methods We explored the potential of the medical history to inform on the phenome-wide risk of onset for 1,883 disease endpoints across clinical specialties. Specifically, we developed a neural network to learn disease-specific risk states from routinely collected health records of 502,460 individuals from the British UK Biobank and validated this model in the US-American All of US cohort with 229,830 individuals. In addition, we illustrated the potential in 24 selected conditions, including type 2 diabetes, hypertension, coronary heart disease, heart failure, and diseases not formerly considered predictable from health records, such as rheumatoid arthritis and endocarditis.
Results We show that the medical history stratifies the risk of onset for all investigated conditions across clinical specialties. For 10-year risk prediction, the medical history provided significant improvements over basic demographic predictors for 1,800 (95.6%) of the 1,883 investigated endpoints in the UK Biobank cohort. After transferring the unmodified risk models to the independent All of US cohort, we found improvements for 1,310 (83.5%) of 1,568 endpoints, demonstrating generalizability across healthcare systems and historically underrepresented groups. Finally, we found predictive information comparable with current guideline-recommended scores for the primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases and illustrated how the risk scores could facilitate rapid response to emerging pathogenic health threats.
Conclusion Our study demonstrates the great potential of leveraging the medical history to provide comprehensive phenome-wide risk estimation at minimal cost. We anticipate that this approach has the potential to disrupt medical practice and decision-making, from early disease diagnosis, slowing of disease progression to interventions against preventable diseases.
Competing Interest Statement
U.L. received grants from Bayer, Novartis, Amgen, consulting fees from Bayer, Sanofi, Amgen, Novartis, Daichy Sankyo, and honoraria from Novartis, Sanofi, Bayer, Amgen, Daichy Sankyo. J.D. received consulting fees from GENinCode UK Ltd, honoraria from Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck, Pfizer, Aegerion, Novartis, Sanofi, Takeda, Novo Nordisk, Bayer, and is chief medical advisor to Our Future Health. R.E. received honoraria from Sanofi and consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim. All other authors do declare no competing interests.
Funding Statement
This project has been funded by the Charite - Universitaetsmedizin Berlin and the Einstein Foundation Berlin, throught the Einstein BIH Visiting Fellowship awarded to J.D. The study has been supported by the BMBF-funded Medical Informatics Initiative (HiGHmed, 01ZZ1802A - 01ZZ1802Z) and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) Project-ID 437531118 SFB 1470.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
We would like to acknowledge the support of the UK Biobank and the All of Us Research Program in providing access to their respective datasets. This research has been conducted using data from the UK Biobank (application number 51157) and the All of Us Research Program (by Stefan Hegselmann UserID 5703). Both studies have received ethical approval from their respective institutional review boards and have obtained informed consent from participants. We are grateful to the participants who generously contributed their time and data to make this research possible.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵§ shared senior authorship
Author list updated.
Data Availability
UK Biobank data, including all linked routine health records, are publicly available to bona fide researchers upon application at http://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/using-the-resource/. In this study, primary care data was used following the COPI regulations. The All Of Us cohort data were provided by the All of Us Research Program by permission that can be sought by scientists and the public alike. Currently, however, data access requires affiliation with a US institution. All patient data used throughout this study has been subject to patient consent as covered by the UK Biobank and All Of Us.
