Reliability and validity of clinical tests of cardiorespiratory fitness: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Samuel Harkin, Stephen Cousins, Simon Locke, Brett Gordon
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.03.08.23286976

Article Information

doi 
https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.03.08.23286976
History 
  • March 8, 2023.
Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.

Author Information

  1. Samuel Harkin1,2,*,,
  2. Stephen Cousins1,,
  3. Simon Locke1,3, and
  4. Brett Gordon1,
  1. 1Holsworth Research Initiative, La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia
  2. 2Sportsmed Biologic, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia
  3. 3Bendigo Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine, Bendigo, Victoria Australia
  1. ↵* Corresponding author, E-mail: drsamharkin{at}gmail.com (SH)

  1. ↵ These authors contributed equally to this work

Back to top
Posted March 08, 2023.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email
Reliability and validity of clinical tests of cardiorespiratory fitness: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Samuel Harkin, Stephen Cousins, Simon Locke, Brett Gordon
medRxiv 2023.03.08.23286976; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.03.08.23286976
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools

Subject Area