Abstract
Symptoms of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) are commonly assessed using self-rating instruments like the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ9, for current symptoms), and the Composite International Diagnostic Interview Short-Form (CIDI-SF, for lifetime worst-episode symptoms). Using data from the UKBiobank, we show that corresponding symptoms endorsed through PHQ9 and CIDI-SF have low to moderate genetic correlations (rG=0.43-0.87), and this cannot be fully attributed to different severity thresholds or the use of a skip-structure in CIDI-SF. Through a combination of Mendelian Randomization (MR) and polygenic prediction analyses, we find that PHQ9 symptoms are more associated with traits which reflect general dysphoria, while the skip-structure in CIDI-SF allows for the identification of heterogeneity among likely MDD cases. This has important implications on factor analyses performed on their respective genetic covariance matrices for the purpose of identification of genetic factors behind MDD symptom dimensions and heterogeneity.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
LH, ST, VZ and NC are supported by the TUM Global Incentive Fund. The iPSYCH team is supported by grants from the Lundbeck Foundation (R102-A9118, R155-2014-1724, and R248-2017-2003), NIMH (1R01MH124851-01) and the Universities and University Hospitals of Aarhus and Copenhagen. The Danish National Biobank resource is supported by the Novo Nordisk Foundation. High-performance computer capacity for handling and statistical analysis of iPSYCH data on the GenomeDK HPC facility is provided by the Center for Genomics and Personalised Medicine and the Centre for Integrative Sequencing, iSEQ, Aarhus University, Denmark. AJS is supported by Lundbeckfonden Fellowship R335-2019-2318. VA is supported by Lundbeck foundation postdoctoral grant R380-2021-1465. ST is supported by a Medical Research Council UK PhD Studentship.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This research was conducted under ethical approval from the UK Biobank Resource under application no. 28709. The use of iPSYCH data follows the standards of the Danish Scientific Ethics Committee, the Danish Health Data Authority, the Danish Data Protection Agency, and the Danish Neonatal Screening Biobank Steering Committee. Data access was via secure portals in accordance with Danish data protection guidelines set by the Danish Data Protection Agency, the Danish Health Data Authority, and Statistics Denmark.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
UK Biobank genotype and phenotype data used in this study are from the full release of the UKBiobank Resource obtained under application no. 28709. We used publicly available summary statistics from PGC29 (https://www.med.unc.edu/pgc/results-and-downloads). The individual-level data from the iPSYCH cohort is not publicly available due to institutional restrictions on data sharing and privacy concerns. Summary statistics of all PHQ9 and WorstEpisode symptoms presented in this paper are available on https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.22041212.
