Abstract
Background Patients with brain metastases that undergo brain metastasis resection regularly receive perioperative dexamethasone. We sought to evaluate whether perioperative dexamethasone in brain metastases is linked to survival.
Methods Retrospective data on perioperative dexamethasone dosage in resected brain metastasis patients at three hospital sites of the Charité from 2010-2022 were collected. Cut-off values for cumulative perioperative dexamethasone dose as a continuous predictor variable for survival were determined using maximally selected rank statistics. Patients were dichotomized based on determined cut-offs of cumulative dexamethasone (pre-operative: < 40 mg vs ≥40 mg; post-operative: < 180 mg vs ≥ 180 mg) and pre- and postoperative: < 281 mg vs ≥ 281 mg). Medical records included baseline demographic, radiological, histopathological and treatment-related characteristics. Based on cut-off values for dexamethasone downstream statistical analyses included Kaplan-Meier, Cox proportional hazards regression for overall survival with adjustment for potential confounders including age, gender, Karnofsky performance status and presence of extracranial metastasis via propensity score matching.
Results 539 patients were included. Median follow-up time was 58,97 months. After adjusting for age, gender, Karnofsky performance status and presence of extracranial metastasis patients with higher cumulative perioperative dexamethasone (≥281 mg) showed shorter survival (HR: 1.47 (1.20-1.80, p<0.001) as compared to patients with lower cumulative doses (<281 mg). This effect remained significant after correction for patients that died within 2 months after resection and for patients with KPS below 50% and, independently from this approach performing propensity score matched-based analysis of the total cohort of patients, respectively.
Conclusion Cumulative perioperative dexamethasone is associated with decreased survival in the context of brain metastasis resection. Strict dosage, down taper or methods reducing corticosteroid dependency should be regularly evaluated in clinical practice in patients with brain metastases.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
No funding disclosures.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study is in accordance with the ethical standards outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the research ethic board at the Charite (EA1/399/20).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Raw data and R code and raw data will be made available at github upon request.