Abstract
Background A critical step in evaluating healthcare interventions is to understand their impact on healthcare costs. However, there is a limited understanding of the causal impact that biomarkers and risk factors for disease have on healthcare-related costs. Previous studies based on observational data have major limitations including residual confounding and reverse causation. Here, we used a genetically-informed design, Mendelian Randomization (MR), to infer the causal impact of 15 routinely measured and clinically relevant risk factors on annual total healthcare costs.
Methods We considered 373,160 participants from the FinnGen Study, which were linked to detailed healthcare costs covering inpatient, outpatient, and medication costs. Several MR approaches were used to assess the causal effects of 15 risk factors (e.g., waist circumference (WC), HDL cholesterol, vitamin D), with strong genetic bases on annual total healthcare costs, as well as stratified by service type, age, and sex. We further assessed the generalizability and robustness of our results by accounting for selection bias and by leveraging additional data from 323,774 individuals from the United Kingdom and Netherlands.
Results Robust causal effects were observed for waist circumference (WC), adult body mass index, and systolic blood pressure, in which a one standard deviation increase in the risk factors corresponded to 22.78% [95% CI: 18.75, 26.95], 13.64% [10.26, 17.12], and 13.08% [8.84, 17.48] increased annual total healthcare costs, respectively. The relative effect of WC on annual total healthcare costs was consistent across age and sex and was not attenuated when accounting for increased risk of five major diseases: back pain, chronic ischemic heart disease, type 2 diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and stroke. A lack of causal effects was observed for some clinically relevant biomarkers, such as albumin, C-reactive protein, and vitamin D.
Conclusion Our results indicated that increased WC is a major contributor to annual total healthcare costs and more attention should be given to WC screening, surveillance, and mitigation. On the contrary, several biomarkers relevant in clinical settings did not have a direct impact on annual total healthcare costs.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
A.G. was supported by the Academy of Finland (grant no. 323116) and by the European Research Council under the European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme (grant no. 945733). This project has also received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under grant agreement no. 101016775. The Medical Research Council (MRC) and the University of Bristol support the MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit [MC_UU_00011/1]. NMD was supported via a Norwegian Research Council Grant number 295989.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
FinnGen Scientific Committee of Finnish Institute for Molecular Medicine gave ethical approval for this work under Analysis Proposal Number F_2021_057.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon request to the authors.