Abstract
In progressing the use of big data in health systems, standardised nomenclature is required to enable data pooling and analyses. In many radiotherapy planning systems and their data archives, target volumes (TV) and organ-at-risk (OAR) structure nomenclature has not been standardised. Machine learning (ML) have been utilized to standardise volumes nomenclature in retrospective datasets. However, only subsets of the structures have been targeted. Within this paper, we proposed a new approach for standardizing all the structures nomenclature by using multi-modal artificial neural networks. A cohort consisting of 1613 breast cancer patients treated with radiotherapy was identified from Liverpool & Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, NSW, Australia. Four types of volume characteristics were generated to represent each target and OAR volume: textual features, geometric features, dosimetry features, and imaging data. Five datasets were created from the original cohort, the first four represented different subsets of volumes and the last one represented the whole list of volumes. For each dataset, 15 sets of combinations of features were generated to investigate the effect of using different characteristics on the standardisation performance. The best model reported 99.416% classification accuracy over the hold-out sample when used to standardise all the nomenclatures in a breast cancer radiotherapy plan into 21 classes. Our results showed that ML based automation methods can be used for standardising naming conventions in a radiotherapy plan taking into consideration the inclusion of multiple modalities to better represent each volume.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the South Western Sydney Local Health District (SWSLHD); Illawarra and Shoalhaven Local Health District (ISLHD); Western Sydney Local Health District (WSLHD); Nepean Blue Mountains Local Health District (NBMLHD); Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia; Ingham Institute Data and Cancer Research Grant 2019-Detecting and Fixing Variations in Cancer Patients Medical Records.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study was approved by the NSW Population & Health Services Research Ethics Committee (2019/ETH01550; 11/09/2016).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
This work was supported by the South Western Sydney Local Health District (SWSLHD); Illawara And Shoalhaven Local Health District (ISLHD); Western Sydney Local Health District (WSLHD); Nepean Blue Mountains Local Health District (NBMLHD); Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia; Ingham Institute Data and Cancer Research Grant 2019 “Detecting and Fixing Variations in Cancer Patients Medical Records”.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors. Researchers will need to be added to the ethics protocol to access data used in this study.
