Abstract
Introduction Algorithmic management (AM) is rapidly changing how work is organized and managed globally. Courier work is one of the most affected occupations due to the common use of digital labour platforms. Existing research about AM has predominantly focused on its functionalities and failed to capture the underlying mechanism of AM as a potential source of work stress. This study aimed to fill the gap and explore how AM change Chinese couriers’ work experience.
Method We conducted 15 in-depth interviews with couriers in May-June 2021 in China. Thematic analysis was completed using Nvivo 12.
Results Couriers’ responses to AM and its effects varied as some felt motivated while others frustrated. AM can introduce new work stressors and interact with existing factors to alleviate or intensify work stress. Key themes emerged from the interviews included ‘App the “boss”‘, ‘Unequal exposure to AM and the role of human support’, ‘New work stressors of AM – Dehumanization and Datafication’, ‘Job stressors intensified by AM’ and ‘Varying individual response to AM’. App ‘the boss’ described how the couriers felt when managed by algorithms. Employed, gig and agency couriers had different exposure to AM and human support of different quality. Dehumanization characterizes how algorithmic systems fulfil managerial functions in ways that differ from managers qualitatively or quantitatively. Datafication refers to the conversion of real-world information and user behaviour into data and being input in the system to assist automated decision-making. Couriers also reported that the use of digital methods could intensify some work stressors, e.g. time pressure and customer behavior. Nevertheless, some couriers reported that AM provided new job resources, e.g. flexible hours, job opportunities, pay transparency, and bypassing office politics.
Conclusion This paper identified key work stressors of AM and explored how AM interacts with existing work stressors to shape Chinese couriers’ work experience. Dehumanization could reduce the quality of support and their sense of relatedness to the workplace. Datafication or extraction of data from workers and lack of transparency led to concerns about potential discrimination, workplace unfairness and power imbalance. Couriers’ responses to AM varied and future research should take such heterogeneity into account.
Competing Interest Statement
PW is a director and shareholder of CareLoop Health Ltd, a digital mental health company.
Funding Statement
The project is funded by the MRC Public Health Intervention Development Scheme (PHIND). Grant Ref: MR/T027215/1. CA is supported by the NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre and NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The University Research Ethics Committee at University of Manchester, Ref: 2021-8761-18609 and Ethics Review Committee at the Beijing Normal University, Ref: 20200113011 gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.