Abstract
Children with intellectual disability (ID) have a higher risk of long-term health problems in adulthood. India has the highest prevalence of ID of any country with 1.6 million under-five children living with the condition. Despite this, compared with other children, this neglected population is excluded from mainstream disease prevention and health promotion programmes. Our objective was to develop an evidence-based conceptual framework for a needs-based inclusive intervention to reduce the risk of communicable and non-communicable diseases among children with ID in India.
From April through to July 2020 we undertook community engagement and involvement activities in ten States in India using a community-based participatory approach, guided by the bio-psycho-social model. We adapted the five steps recommended for the design and evaluation of a public participation process for the health sector.
Seventy stakeholders from ten States contributed to the project: 44 parents and 26 professionals who work with people with ID. We mapped the outputs from two rounds of stakeholder consultations with evidence from systematic reviews to develop a conceptual framework that underpins an approach to develop a cross-sectoral family-centred needs-based inclusive intervention to improve health outcomes for children with ID. A working theory of change (ToC) model delineates a pathway that reflected the priorities of the target population. We discussed the models during a third round of consultations to identify limitations, relevance of the concepts, structural and social barriers that could influence acceptability and adherence, success criteria, and integration with existing health system and service delivery.
There are currently no health promotion programmes focusing on children with ID in India despite the population being at a higher risk of developing comorbid health problems. Therefore, an urgent next step is to test the conceptual model to determine acceptance and effectiveness within the context of socio-economic challenges faced by the children and their families in the country.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The CEI work included in this paper was funded by a National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR), RIGHT Call 3 Proposal and Partnership Development Award (Ref: NIHR201720). MN is funded by a Medical Research Council Transition Support Award (Ref: MR/W029294/1). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection, analysis, or writing the paper.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
N/A
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Our qualitative data includes transcripts from a public engagement and involvement work. Even if we remove the names and other personal details, the data would be still potentially identifiable of the persons/organisations including government representatives whose views might be considered professionally and politically sensitive. This is particularly true for our work that focuses on intellectual disability and includes quotes related to stigma and social injustice. So, to protect confidentiality we did not seek consent from the participants to share data in an open access repository. Participants consented to including quotes in scientific reports, publications and presentations, but not to have entire transcripts made publicly available or available to a third party. We would be happy to consider requests for data from interested individuals or organisations who approach the corresponding author provided we could work out ways to share non-identifiable information.
