Abstract
Background Asylum seekers and refugees (ASR) in Germany are dispersed quasi-randomly to state-provided, collective accommodation centres. We aimed to analyse contextual effects of post-migration housing environment on their mental health.
Methods We drew a balanced random sample of 54 from 1 938 accommodation centres with 70 634 ASR in Germany’s 3rd largest federal state. Individual-level data on depression (PHQ2) and anxiety (GAD2) symptoms as well as sociodemographic- and asylum-related covariates, was collected and linked to contextual geo-referenced data on housing environment (‘Small-area Housing Environment Deterioration’ index, number of residents, remoteness, urbanity and German Index of Multiple Deprivation). We fitted two-level random-intercept models to exploratively estimate adjusted contextual effects.
Results Of 411 surveyed participants, 45.53% and 44.83%, respectively, reported symptoms of depression or anxiety. 52.8% lived in centres with highest deterioration, 46.2% in centres with >=50 residents, 76.9% in urban, and 56% in deprived districts. 7.4% of centres were remote. The accommodation-level median odds ratio for GAD2 was 2.10 with contextual-level variance of 16%.
For odds of reporting GAD2 / PHQ2, the highest degree of deterioration (OR 2.22; 95% CI 0.52-9.59 / 1.99;0.55-7.18), large accommodation size (1.34;0.59-3.06. / 1.12;0.56-2.26), remoteness (2.16;0.32-14.79 / 3.79;0.62-23.18) and district urbanity (3.05;0.98-9.49 / 1.14;0.46-2.79) showed higher, but statistically not significant, point-estimates. District deprivation demonstrated higher odds for GAD2 (1.21;0.51-2.88) and, inversely, lower odds for PHQ2 (0.88;0.41-1.89).
Conclusion We found tendencies for, but no significant, contextual effects of housing environment on ASR mental health in accommodation centres. Confirmatory analyses with prior power calculations are needed to complement these exploratory estimates.
What is already known on this subject Research on mental health of asylum seekers and refugees (ASR) has focused on pre- and peri-migratory factors, and increasingly recognizes post-migratory factors and their importance in restoring, sustaining, and protecting health to enable societal integration and participation. Research on the small-area housing environment, and its potential health effects is still scarce, and often limited by high-levels of aggregation of contextual factors, crude or not-standardised measurements on housing characteristics, and risk of compositional bias due to selective migration into housing environments.
What this study adds We make use of the quasi-random allocation of ASR to state-provided, collective accommodation centres, and link individual-level data on health and socio-demographic variables with small-area measures of contextual housing environment at accommodation-level to explore potential effects while minimising the risk of compositional bias. Accommodation-level factors contribute considerably to mental health variance. A tendency towards higher odds of reporting symptoms of generalized anxiety could be observed for housing deterioration, higher numbers of residents, remoteness as well as district urbanity and deprivation. Similar tendencies were estimated for reporting symptoms of depression except for deprivation potentially functioning protectively. Confirmatory research with appropriate sample size calculations as well as mediation and structural equation analysis are needed. Results may guide policy makers in design and planning of needs-based health services and housing infrastructure.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by: - the German Federal Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF) in the scope of the project RESPOND (Grant Number: 01GY1611) - the German Science Foundation (DFG) in the scope of the NEXUS project (FOR 2928 / GZ: BO 5233/1-1) The author AM acknowledges financial support by the Else Kroener-Fresenius-Stiftung (2017_Promotionskolleg.08) within the Heidelberg Graduate School of Global Health
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics committee of Medical Faculty of Heidelberg gave ethical approval for this work on October 12, 2017 (S- 516/2017).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
