Abstract
Adjustment for prognostic covariates increases the statistical power of randomized trials. The factors influencing increase of power are well-known for trials with continuous outcomes. Here, we study which factors influence power and sample size requirements in time-to-event trials. We consider both parametric simulations and simulations derived from the TCGA cohort of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients to assess how sample size requirements are reduced with covariate adjustment. Simulations demonstrate that the benefit of covariate adjustment increases with the prognostic performance of the adjustment covariate (C-index) and with the cumulative incidence of the event in the trial. For a covariate that has an intermediate prognostic performance (C-index=0.65), the reduction of sample size varies from 1.7% when cumulative incidence is of 10% to 26.5% when cumulative incidence is of 90%. Broadening eligibility criteria usually reduces statistical power while our simulations show that it can be maintained with adequate covariate adjustment. In a simulation of HCC trials, we find that the number of patients screened for eligibility can be divided by 2.7 when broadening eligibility criteria. Last, we find that the Cox-Snell 
is a good approximation of the reduction in sample size requirements provided by covariate adjustment. This metric can be used in the design of time-to-event trials to determine sample size. Overall, more systematic adjustment for prognostic covariates leads to more efficient and inclusive clinical trials especially when cumulative incidence is large as in metastatic and advanced cancers.
Key messages
Covariate adjustment is a statistical technique that leverages prognostic scores within the statistical analysis of a trial. We study its benefits for time-to-event trials.
Power gain achieved with covariate adjustment is determined by the prognostic performance of the covariate and by the cumulative incidence of events at the end of the follow-up period.
Trials in indications with large cumulative incidence such as metastatic cancers can benefit from covariate adjustment to improve their statistical power.
Covariate adjustment maintains statistical power in trials when eligibility criteria are broadened.
Competing Interest Statement
All authors are employees of Owkin.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by Owkin.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study used (or will use) ONLY openly available human data that were originally located at: https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
TCGA data is available by download except for predictions of HCCnet that are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
