Abstract
Advanced visual computing solutions and 3D printing are starting to move from the engineering and development stage to being integrated into clinical pipelines for training, planning and guidance of complex interventions. Commonly, clinicians make decisions based on the exploration of patient-specific medical images in 2D flat monitors using specialised software with standard multi-planar reconstruction (MPR) visualisation. The new generation of visual computing technologies such as 3D imaging, 3D printing, 3D advanced rendering, Virtual Reality and in-silico simulations from Virtual Physiological Human models, provide complementary ways to better understand the structure and function of the organs under study and improve and personalise clinical decisions. Cardiology is a medical field where new visual computing solutions are already having an impact in decisions such as the selection of the optimal therapy for a given patient. A good example is the role of emerging visualisation technologies to choose the most appropriate settings of a left atrial appendage occluder (LAAO) device that needs to be implanted in some patients with atrial fibrillation having contraindications to drug therapies. Clinicians need to select the type and size of the LAAO device to implant, as well as the location to be deployed. Usually, interventional cardiologists make these decisions after the analysis of patient-specific medical images in 2D flat monitors with MPR visualisation, before and during the procedure, obtain manual measurements characterising the cardiac anatomy of the patient to avoid adverse events after the implantation. In this paper we evaluate several advanced visual computing solutions such as web-based 3D imaging visualisation (VIDAA platform), Virtual Reality (VRIDAA platform) and computational fluid simulations and 3D printing for the planning of LAAO device implantations. Six physicians including three interventional and three imaging cardiologists, with different level of experience in LAAO, tested the different technologies in preoperative data of 5 patients to identify the usability, friendliness, limitations and requirements for clinical translation of each technology through a qualitative questionnaire. The obtained results demonstrate the potential impact of advanced visual computing solutions to improve the planning of LAAO interventions but also a need of unification of them in order to be able to be uses in a clinical environment.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities under the Retos I+D (RTI2018-101193-B-I00), the Maria de Maeztu Units of Excellence (MDM-2015-0502), the Formation of Doctors (PRE2018-084062).Additionally, this work was supported by the H2020 EU SimCardioTest project (Digital transformation in Health and Care SC1-DTH-06-2020; grant agreement No. 101016496).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics committee of Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Bordeaux gave ethical approval for this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript
