Abstract
Background Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs include preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative clinical pathways to improve quality of patient care while reducing length of stay and readmission. This study assessed the feasibility and outcomes of an ERAS protocol for colorectal surgery implemented over two-years in a small, resource-challenged rural hospital.
Study design A prospective cohort study used retrospectively matched controls to assess the effect of ERAS on LOS in patients undergoing colorectal surgery in a small rural hospital in northern Ontario, Canada. ERAS patients were matched to two patients in the control group based on diagnosis, age and gender. Patients had open or laparoscopic colorectal surgeries, with those in the intervention group treated per ERAS protocol and given instructions on pre- and post-operative self-care.
Results Most ERAS patients reported adherence to ERAS protocols prior to surgery. Approximately one quarter of patients chose not to complete the postoperative survey. Of those who completed the survey, adherence to protocol was strongest for chewing gum in the days after surgery. Most patients were sitting in a chair for their afternoon meal by the first day and most were walking down the hallway by the second day. The control and ERAS patient groups did not differ significantly (p≥0.07) in age (
years, sd=13.1), gender (52% male), nor in the Canadian Classification of Health Interventions 5-character code. The control group significantly higher (p<0.001) malignant neoplasm of colon (C18, 69% vs 35%), and significantly lower malignant neoplasm of rectum (C20, 0% vs 5%), relative to the ERAS group. The control group had an average ln-transformed LOS that was significantly longer (exponentiated as 1.7 days) than ERAS patients (t-test, p<0.001).
Conclusion This study found that ERAS could be implemented in a small rural hospital and provided evidence for a reduced LOS of approximately two days.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Protocols
N?A
Funding Statement
This project was funded by the Northern Ontario Academic Medicine Association
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Not Applicable
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Laurentian University Research Ethics Board
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Not Applicable
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Not Applicable
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Not Applicable
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest: There are no conflicts of interest to declare.
This work was supported by the Northern Ontario Academic Medical Association Clinical Innovation Fund.
Abbreviations
- CCI
- Canadian Classification of Health Interventions
- EMR
- electronic medical record
- ERAS
- Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
- ICD-10-CA
- International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision, Canadian modification
- LOS
- length of stay
- RNFA
- Registered Nurse First Assistant
- HDMH
- Huntsville District Memorial Hospital
- MAHC
- Muskoka Algonquin Healthcare
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos