PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Roldan, Hector A.
AU  - Brown, Andrew R.
AU  - Radey, Jane
AU  - Hogenbirk, John C.
AU  - Allen, Lisa R.
TI  - Enhanced Recovery After Surgery reduced length of stay after colorectal surgery in a small rural hospital in Ontario
AID  - 10.1101/2022.03.23.22272850
DP  - 2022 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2022.03.23.22272850
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/03/25/2022.03.23.22272850.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/03/25/2022.03.23.22272850.full
AB  - Background Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs include preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative clinical pathways to improve quality of patient care while reducing length of stay and readmission. This study assessed the feasibility and outcomes of an ERAS protocol for colorectal surgery implemented over two-years in a small, resource-challenged rural hospital.Study design A prospective cohort study used retrospectively matched controls to assess the effect of ERAS on LOS in patients undergoing colorectal surgery in a small rural hospital in northern Ontario, Canada. ERAS patients were matched to two patients in the control group based on diagnosis, age and gender. Patients had open or laparoscopic colorectal surgeries, with those in the intervention group treated per ERAS protocol and given instructions on pre- and post-operative self-care.Results Most ERAS patients reported adherence to ERAS protocols prior to surgery. Approximately one quarter of patients chose not to complete the postoperative survey. Of those who completed the survey, adherence to protocol was strongest for chewing gum in the days after surgery. Most patients were sitting in a chair for their afternoon meal by the first day and most were walking down the hallway by the second day. The control and ERAS patient groups did not differ significantly (p≥0.07) in age (years, sd=13.1), gender (52% male), nor in the Canadian Classification of Health Interventions 5-character code. The control group significantly higher (p<0.001) malignant neoplasm of colon (C18, 69% vs 35%), and significantly lower malignant neoplasm of rectum (C20, 0% vs 5%), relative to the ERAS group. The control group had an average ln-transformed LOS that was significantly longer (exponentiated as 1.7 days) than ERAS patients (t-test, p<0.001).Conclusion This study found that ERAS could be implemented in a small rural hospital and provided evidence for a reduced LOS of approximately two days.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical Protocols N?A Funding StatementThis project was funded by the Northern Ontario Academic Medicine AssociationAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.Not ApplicableThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Laurentian University Research Ethics BoardI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.Not ApplicableI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Not ApplicableI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.Not ApplicableAll relevant data with statistical analyses are included in the manuscript. Should raw data be requested it is available from the database stored on the Muskoka Algonquin Healthcare server within the ERAS 1 file.CCICanadian Classification of Health InterventionsEMRelectronic medical recordERASEnhanced Recovery After SurgeryICD-10-CAInternational Classification of Diseases, 10th revision, Canadian modificationLOSlength of stayRNFARegistered Nurse First AssistantHDMHHuntsville District Memorial HospitalMAHCMuskoka Algonquin Healthcare