Ventricular and Atrial Pressure-Volume Loops: Analysis of the Effects Induced by Right Centrifugal Pump Assistance

INTRODUCTION

The main indications for right ventricular assist device (RVAD) support are right heart failure after implantation of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) or early graft failure following heart transplantation. Measurement of right heart function is often overlooked during daily clinical practice. The study by [1] is an attempt to better understand RV pathophysiology in the setting of pulmonary hypertension, which represents the prevalent pathological condition for RVAD indication, whether to support a failing left ventricle or a primarily involved RV [2].

However, the lack of data does not allow an in-depth analysis of right ventricular and atrial behaviour during RVAD support. An attempt in this direction can be made using a numerical simulator of the cardiovascular system with a view to reproduce pathological conditions requiring right ventricular assistance.

The aim of our study was the analysis of the haemodynamic and energetic variables of both ventricles and atria in different cardiovascular conditions reproduced by changing right ventricular contractility from 0.3 to 0.8 mmHg/ml during RVAD support with different rotational speeds.

The first step of this work required the implementation of two new modules within CARDIOSIM^© software simulation platform, which would reproduce the characteristics of the left circulatory network and a continuous flow centrifugal pump (RVAD) to be connected either in series or parallel to the right ventricle. The new modules were based on a 0-D (lumped-parameter) numerical model including input and output cannula of the RVAD.

We simulated RVAD support following in series and parallel connection driven by different rotational speeds in a heart failure setting. Subsequently, the right ventricular elastance was increased from 0.3 to 0.8 mmHg/ml in a stepwise manner. During each setting, we focused our attention on the following hemodynamic and energetic variables:

• ✓ Right and left ventricular end-systolic volume (ESV_R-V and ESV_L-V);

• ✓ Right and left ventricular end-diastolic volume (EDV_R-V and EDV_L-V);

• ✓ Stroke volume (SV);

• ✓ Right and left ventricular external work (EW_R-V and EW_L-V) and pressure-volume area (PVA_R-V and PVA_L-V);

• ✓ Right and left atrial end-systolic volume (ESV_R-A and ESV_L-A);

• ✓ Right and left atrial end-diastolic volume (EDV_R-A and EDV_L-A);

• ✓ Right and left atrial pressure-volume loop area (PVLA_R-A and PVLA_L-A);

• ✓ Cardiac output (CO);

• ✓ Systolic, diastolic and mean systemic aortic pressure (AoP);

• ✓ Systolic, diastolic and mean pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP);

• ✓ Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP);

• ✓ Right and left atrial pressure (RAP and LAP).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The heart and circulatory numerical network

CARDIOSIM^© software platform has been previously described [3]-[8]. The modules of the software simulator are: systemic and pulmonary arterial section, systemic and pulmonary venous section and the coronary circulation. Native left and right ventricles, atria and septum reproduce the entire cardiac activity; they are implemented in a single module (Fig. 1) using the time-varying elastance concept [4],[5]. The ventricular, atrial and septal activity is synchronized with the electrocardiographic (ECG) signal [5]. Using the modified time-varying elastance theory, the inter-ventricular septum (IVS) interaction and the instantaneous left and right ventricular pressure can be reproduced by [5],[10]:

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Fig. 1

Electric analogue of the cardiovascular system. The network is assembled with septum, left and right heart, main and small pulmonary arterial sections, pulmonary arteriole and capillary sections, pulmonary venous section. The left circulation include ascending and descending aorta compartments, peripheral arteries and carotid artery sections, coronary circulation, superior and inferior vena cava sections and systemic veins compartment. RVAD is the right ventricular assist device. Table 2 lists the symbols used.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Fig. 1a

The behavior of the ascending aorta is simulated with resistances R_AA and R_Vaa, inertance L_AA and compliance C_AA. QR_AA is the flow through the resistance and inertance. The descending aorta is implemented with resistances R_DA and R_Vda, inertance L_DA and compliance C_DA. QR_DA is the flow through the resistance (R_DA) and inertance (L_DA). The carotid arteries section is reproduced with a simple resistance (R_CA). The superior vena cava module consists of resistances R_{SVC_I} and R_{SVC_II}, inertance L_SCV and compliance C_SVC. The inferior vena cava module is modelled with resistances R_IVC, R_{IVC_I} and _{RIVC_II}, inertance L_IVC and compliance C_IVC. The intrathoracic pressure (Pt) affects compliances C_AA, C_DA, C_IVC and C_SVC. Table 2 lists the symbols used.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Fig. 1b

The peripheral arteries module is modelled with resistances R_A and R_Va and compliance C_A. The resistor R_Va account for viscous losses of the vessels wall. QR_A is the blood flow outside the compartment; it is a part of the blood that reaches the systemic veins compartment.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Fig. 1c

Schematic representation of RVAD connection. When the right ventricular assist device is connected in parallel, blood is removed from the right atrium (SW₁=ON and SW₂=OFF) and ejected into the pulmonary artery. When RVAD is connected in series, blood is removed from the right ventricle (SW₁=OFF and SW₂=ON) and ejected into the pulmonary artery. The input (output) RVAD cannula is modelled with RLC elements. Q_oPUMP (Q_iPUMP) is the output (inlet) flow rate from the pump. Q_oCANN (Q_iCANN) is the output (inlet) flow rate from the cannula. The electrical analogue of the pulmonary circulation is described in Error! Reference source not found..

In the same way, the inter-atrial septum (IAS) interaction and the left and right instantaneous atrial pressure can be reproduced by: The symbols used in Eqs. (1) and (2) have been listed in Table 1. These features allow the simulation of inter-ventricular and intra-ventricular dyssynchrony [10].

Specific modules of the coronary circulation (Fig. 1) are also available in CARDIOSIM^© platform [3].

For the purposes of our study, we have assembled the cardiovascular network with the new module of the systemic circulation whilst the behavior of the heart is modelled as described in [3],[4]. The systemic venous section [3],[6] and the entire pulmonary circulation [7],[8],[11],[12] are modelled as described in current literature. We have selected the module presented in [13] for the coronary circulation. The tricuspid, mitral, pulmonary, and aortic valves are modelled with an ideal diode: when the pressure across the valve is positive, the valve opens and allows the flow of blood; when the pressure is less than or equal to zero, the valve is closes and the flow of blood is zero [3]-[5],[14]

RESULTS

Figure 2 shows the effects induced by different values for ESPVR slope (Ees_RIGHT) on left and right atrial pressure-volume loop area (left upper panel). The percentage changes calculated with respect to the reference value for Ees_RIGHT=0.3 mmHg/ml have been listed. The red bars show the percentage change with respect to the reference value for PVLA_L-A increase at high Ees_RIGHT values. On the contrary, the PVLA_R-A (yellow bars) decreases when the percentage change is referred to high Ees_RIGHT values. These results show that when Ees_RIGHT increases from 0.3 to 08 mmHg/ml, the area of the pressure-volume loop of the right atrium decreases whilst the area of the pressure-volume loop of the left atrium increases (Fig. 3). The left and right lower panel shows the left and right atrial pressure-volume loop obtained with different Ees_RIGHT values. The black pressure-volume loop was obtained setting Ees_RIGHT=0.3 mmHg/ml, while the blue pressure-volume loop was obtained setting Ees_RIGHT=0.6 mmHg/ml. The left (left side) and the right (right side) ventricular pressure-volume loops are placed in the upper panels. When Ees_RIGHT increases, EW_{L_V} and PVA_L-V (left upper panel) increase leading to right-sided shift with increased left ESV and EDV. The effect induced by different Ees_RIGHT values on left and right ventricular EW (EW_L-V and EW_R-V) are reported in Fig. 2 (left lower panel). The effect induced on EDV and ESV of the left (right) atrium is reported in the upper (lower) right panel (Fig. 2). The effect induced on right atrial ESV is more evident than the one produced on right atrial EDV. Figure 3 (right upper panel) shows that an increase in Ees_RIGHT leads to an increase in right ventricular external work and PVA_R-V with left-sided shift and decrease of both right ESV and EDV. Figure 4 shows the effect induced by RVAD support driven in parallel connection (left panels) on left ventricular PVA_L-V (left upper panel) and EW_L-V (left lower panel). The effect induced on PVA_L-V and EW_L-V when the RVAD is driven in series is available in the right panels. The data were measured for different values of Ees_RIGHT (0.3; 0.5 and 0.8 mmHg/ml) and with increasing RVAD rotational speed (2000; 2500; 3000; 3500 and 4000 rpm). For each rotational speed and Ees_RIGHT values, the percentage changes calculated with respect to the reference value measured in pathological conditions have been listed (Fig. 4). The highest percentage changes in PVA_L-V and EW_L-V (50% or more for both variables) were recorded in a diseased condition with right ventricular elastance set to Ees_RIGHT=0.3 mmHg/ml during in-parallel RVAD assistance with pump rotational speed at 4000 rpm. Figure 5 shows the effect induced by in-parallel RVAD support on left ventricular ESV_L-V (left upper panel) and EDV_L-V (left lower panel). The effect induced on ESV_L-V (right upper panel) and EDV_L-V (right lower panel) by in-series RVAD support is also available for comparison purposes. When the rotational speed of the pump was set to 2000 rpm, the percentage changes for each value of right ventricular ESPVR slope were no more than 3%. The effects induced by different rotational speed of the RVAD on left and right atrial pressure-volume loop area are available in Fig. 6 for three different values of right ESPVR slope. In addition, for each value of the slope, the effect induced by the pump has been calculated in percentage terms with respect to the value obtained without assistance. In the case of the right atrium, we observed a higher percentage reduction of the loop area (from 2% to 9%) during in-series assistance (left lower panel). In the case of parallel connection (left upper panel), the percentage reduction of the pressure-volume loop area of the right atrium becomes more evident at high values for both the slope and the pump rotational speed. Right heart assistance produces significant effects on the left atrium loop area (right panels). Percentage variations between 20% and 50% are observed when the RVAD is connected in parallel to the right ventricle (right upper panel). Whether in-series or in-parallel assistance is considered, the most significant percentage variations are observed when the right ventricular ESPVR slope is set to Ees_RIGHT=0.3 mmHg/ml. The effects induced by RVAD support on the right ventricular flow output and on the total cardiac output are showed in Fig. 7. RVAD parallel assistance generated a lower reduction in right ventricular output compared to in series assistance for each Ees_RIGHT value and each pump rotational speed. More specifically, when the pump speed was set to 4000 rpm, parallel assistance induced a reduction between 20% and 45% compared to the baseline value while the in series assistance induced a reduction between 38% and 78%. The upper panels in Fig. 7 show that parallel RVAD assistance generates a higher increase in total cardiac output compared to in series assistance at pump speeds higher than 3500 rpm (for each Ees_RIGHT value).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Fig. 2

Relative changes calculated in comparison to Ees_RIGHT=0.3 mmHg/ml for different Ees_RIGHT values (0.4-0.8 mmHg/ml). The relative changes of the pressure-volume loop area of the left and right atrium (external work of the left and right ventricle) are reported in the left upper (lower) panel. The right upper (lower) panel shows the relative changes of left (right) atrial end systolic and end diastolic volume.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Fig. 3

Screen output from CARDIOSIM^© software simulator. The left (right) upper panel shows four left (right) ventricular pressure-volume loops obtained setting EesR_lrlEes_RIGHT=0.3 mmHg/ml (black line), EesR_lrlEes_RIGHT=0.4 mmHg/ml (green line), EesR_lrlEes_RIGHT=0.5 mmHg/ml (red line) and EesR_lrlEes_RIGHT=0.6 mmHg/ml (blue line) respectively. The left (right) lower panel shows four left (right) atrial pressure-volume loops obtained changing the slope of the right ventricular elastance as previously described.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Fig. 4

Relative changes calculated in comparison to pathological conditions (EesR_lrlEes_RIGHT=0.3; 0.5 and 0.8 mmHg/ml) for different type of RVAD connection and different rotational speed. For each values of Ees_RIGHT, the relative change was calculated when the RVAD was connected in parallel and in series. The left upper (lower) panel shows the relative changes in the left ventricular pressure-volume area (external work) when the RVAD was connected in parallel to the right ventricle. The right upper (lower) panel shows the relative changes in the left ventricular pressure-volume area (external work) when the RVAD was connected in series to the right ventricle.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Fig. 5

Relative changes calculated in comparison to pathological conditions (EesR_lrlEes_RIGHT=0.3; 0.5 and 0.8 mmHg/ml) for different type of RVAD connection and different rotational speed. For each values of Ees_RIGHT, the relative change was calculated when the RVAD was connected in parallel and “in series” mode. The left upper (lower) panel shows the relative changes in the left ventricular end systolic (end diastolic) volume when the RVAD was connected in parallel to the right ventricle. The right upper (lower) panel shows the relative changes in the left ventricular end systolic (end diastolic) volume when the RVAD was connected in series to the right ventricle.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Fig. 6

Relative changes calculated in comparison to pathological conditions (EesR_lrlEes_RIGHT=0.3; 0.5 and 0.8 mmHg/ml) for different type of RVAD connection and different rotational speed. For each values of Ees_RIGHT, the relative change was calculated when the RVAD was connected in parallel and in series mode. The left (right) upper panel shows the relative changes in the right (left) atrium pressure-volume loop area when the RVAD was connected in parallel to the right ventricle. The left (right) lower panel shows the relative changes in the right (left) atrium pressure-volume loop area when the RVAD was connected in series to the right ventricle.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Fig. 7

Relative changes calculated in comparison to pathological conditions (EesR_lrlEes_RIGHT=0.3; 0.5 and 0.8 mmHg/ml) for different types of RVAD connection and different rotational speed. For each value of Ees_RIGHT, the relative change was calculated when the RVAD was connected in parallel and in series mode. The left (right) upper panel shows the relative changes in the total cardiac output (right ventricular flow output plus RVAD flow output) when the RVAD was connected in series (parallel) to the right ventricle. The left (right) lower panel shows the relative changes in the right ventricular flow output when the RVAD was connected in series (parallel) to the right ventricle.

The left upper (lower) panel in Fig. 8 shows the effects induced on left ventricular (atrial) loop when different types of RVAD assistance were applied to pathological conditions (black loops) reproduced by setting Ees_RIGHT to 0.3 mmHg/ml. The assistance was applied in parallel (red loops) and in series (blue loops) mode with rotational speed of 3000 rpm.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Fig. 8

Screen output generated by CARDIOSIM^© platform. The left (right) upper panel shows the left (right) ventricular pressure-volume loops when pathological conditions (Ees_RIGHT=0.3 mmHg/ml) (black line), in-parallel RVAD (pump rotational speed at 3000 rpm) (red line) and in-series RVAD assistance (pump rotational speed at 3000 rpm) (blue line) were reproduced by the simulator, respectively. The left (right) lower panel shows the left (right) atrial pressure-volume loops reproduced by CARDIOSIM^©.

The right upper (lower) panel shows the effects induced on right ventricular (atrial) loops. When in-parallel assistance was applied, a right-sided shift in the left and right ventricular loop (red lines) was observed. Although in-series RVAD assistance did not cause changes in right end-systolic ventricular volume, it leaded to a reduction in right end-diastolic ventricular loop. The type of assistance did not cause relevant changes in the right atrial loop (right lower panel).

DISCUSSION

The left ventricle (LV) is coupled to the low-compliance, high-resistance peripheral arterial circulation and is more adaptable to changes in pressure than volume. In contrast, the right ventricle (RV) is coupled to the high-compliance, low-resistance pulmonary circulation and is more adaptable to changes in volume than pressure. The right ventricle consists of a free wall containing a wrap-around circumferential muscle at its base and a septum made of oblique helical fibres crossing each other at 60° angles. This is consistent with the helical ventricular myocardial band concept, which defines two interconnected muscle bands: a basal loop with transverse fibres surrounding the left and right ventricles and an apical loop made of a right- and left-handed helix forming an apical vortex [20],[21]. The wrap-around transverse fibres constrict or compress leading to a bellows motion responsible for 20% of right ventricular output whilst the oblique fibres are responsible for shortening and lengthening, which contribute to 80% of right ventricular systolic function [22]. The crista supra-ventricularis shares muscle fibers with the inter-ventricular septum and the free wall playing a key anatomical and functional role [23]. A reduction in longitudinal contraction and an increase in transverse shortening are observed following cardiopulmonary bypass and pericardiotomy [24]. This is quite an important aspect to bear in mind and may be addressed initially with pulmonary vasodilators [25]. The relationship between structure and function plays a key role in clinical decision-making, which must be based on detailed knowledge of normality and recognise how disease can be addressed to restore normality [22]. The important contribution of right ventricular function has been neglected for a long time due to previous observations and assumptions. The onset of right ventricular dysfunction should trigger the search for the main underlying cause in relation to pressure overload, volume overload or primary myocardial disease [26]. Right heart failure (RHF) is difficult to manage because of its complex geometry and a lack of specific treatments aimed at stabilisation and recovery of right ventricular function. Nevertheless, right ventricular dysfunction remains associated with poor clinical outcome regardless of the underlying disease mechanism [27].

A simulation approach overcomes ethical issues and the risk of offering an ineffective or potentially dangerous therapeutic option. At the same time, it may help focus on the specific problem to address. Our starting point was to develop a failing right heart, which would require support at a subsequent stage. The easier way to do it was to act on the ESPVR slope of both ventricles. A range between 0.35 and 0.74 mmHg/ml is observed in patients with pulmonary hypertension [1] with a cut-off of 0.8 for £eS/£a ratio as the onset of right ventricular maladaptation. Our initial aim was to observe the effects of RVAD support with either in series or parallel connection following stepwise variation of right ventricular end-systolic elastance in patients with increased right ventricular afterload. Therefore, the right ventricular end-systolic elastance considered in the present study ranged between 0.3 and 0.8 mmHg/ml as per previously reported values observed in clinical practice [1],[28],[29]. According to [19], increased native cardiac output is observed in the presence of left ventricular systolic impairment when right ventricular end-systolic elastance increases from 0.1 to 1.0 mmHg/ml. An increased native cardiac output is still observed during VA ECMO support following stepwise increase in right ventricular end-systolic elastance but to a lesser degree. A left-to-right ventricular septal shift is observed during diastole following a stepwise increase in right ventricular end-systolic elastance both with and without VA ECMO support. Our considerations are based in the context of pure RVAD support with either in series or parallel connection.

PVA and EW of the left ventricle gain benefit when the pump speed of the RVAD is at least 3500 rpm. The highest effect is obtained when Ees_RIGHT is 0.3 mmHg/ml, which is consistent with significant RV dysfunction (left panels in Fig. 4). The pathological range considered would suggest that early recognition and aggressive RVAD support is advisable where a lower degree of assistance is required generating enough benefit for a less compromised right ventricle with more potential for recovery. This is an important point to consider in the context of LVAD support when the right heart shows signs of failure requiring attention.

The highest beneficial effect is obtained when the RVAD is connected in parallel to the right ventricle with up to nearly 35% increase in total cardiac output (right upper panel in Fig. 7) and lower reduction of right ventricular output compared to in series RVAD connection. No significant effect is observed on the right atrium regardless the type of RVAD connection to the right ventricle. Instead, in-parallel RVAD connection has a more beneficial effect on the left atrium. Again, RVAD support has a more beneficial effect on ESV and EDV of the left ventricle when connected in parallel to the right ventricle (left panels in Fig. 5). The role of the inter-ventricular septum is critical in this context.

Our aim was to observe the effect of pure RVAD assistance at different stages of right ventricular dysfunction to determine appropriate timing for intervention. Our target was early graft failure secondary to right heart dysfunction following orthotopic heart transplant and right ventricular failure following LVAD insertion in an apparently preserved right heart function preoperatively. We have focused our attention mainly on Ees_RIGHT neglecting Vo. We have not considered the progressive increase in afterload. Despite these limitation, our preliminary findings support the concept of early intervention in the presence of a failing right heart regardless of its aetiology. This simulation study confirms what had been previously advocated but not always put into practice [30]. A more liberal right ventricular support may be the way forward [31] when considering different support strategies for a failing right ventricle [32]. Late onset of right ventricular failure remains associated with worse survival and higher cumulative incidence of major adverse events [33].

CONCLUSION

Although RVAD support may be effective in advanced right heart failure, intervention at an earlier stage may require a lesser degree of assistance and be more beneficial for the left ventricle. Early recognition of right ventricular failure followed by aggressive treatment is desirable to achieve a more favourable outcome. RVAD support remains an option for advanced right ventricular failure although the onset of major adverse events may preclude its use. In-parallel RVAD connection to the right ventricle seems a more suitable option.

FUNDING AND CONFLICT OF INTEREST

None