ABSTRACT
Background Cardiorespiratory fitness is rarely measured in population studies. Most studies of fitness do not examine differences by population subgroups or seasonal trends.
Methods We used a validated submaximal exercise test to measure fitness in 5976 women and 5316 men, residing in England. We expressed fitness as maximal oxygen consumption per kilogram total body mass (VO2maxtbm) and fat free mass (VO2maxffm). Descriptive statistics were computed across anthropometric and sociodemographic characteristics, as well as across the year. Progressive multivariable analyses were performed to examine mediation by physical activity energy expenditure (PAEE) and BMI.
Results Mean±SD VO2maxtbm was lower in women (35.4±7.6 ml·min-1·kg-1) than men (42.1±7.4 ml·min-1·kg-1) but VO2maxffm was similar (women: 59.7±11.8 ml·min-1·kg-1; men: 62.5±10.4 ml·min-1·kg-1). Fitness was inversely associated with age but not after adjustment for PAEE. People in more physically demanding jobs were fitter compared to those in sedentary jobs but this association was attenuated in women and reversed in men following adjustment for total PAEE. PAEE and BMI and were positively associated with fitness at all levels of adjustment when fitness was expressed relative to fat-free mass. Fitness during summer was 4% higher than the winter among women, but did not differ by season among men.
Conclusions Fitness was inversely associated with age but less steeply than anticipated, suggesting older generations are comparatively fitter than younger generations. PAEE and BMI were stronger determinants of the variance in fitness than any other characteristic including age. This emphasizes the importance of modifiable physical activity behaviours in public health interventions.
KEY MESSAGES
Fitness was inversely associated with age but less steeply than anticipated, suggesting older generations are comparatively fitter than younger generations
Relationships between cardiorespiratory fitness and sociodemographic characteristics were primarily mediated by physical activity.
A one standard deviation difference in physical activity had the same impact on cardiorespiratory fitness as being 25 years younger
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The Fenland study was funded by the Medical Research Council and the Wellcome Trust. The current work was supported by the Medical Research Council (T.G., S.B., K.Wi., S.H., grant number MC_UU_12015/3), (S.G., grant number MC_UU_12015/4), (N.W., grant number MC_UU_12015/1), (N.G.F., grant number MC_UU_12015/5); the National Institute of Health Research Cambridge (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre (K.We., S.B., N.G.F., and N.W., grant number IS-BRC-1215-20014); and the Cambridge Trust and St Catharine's College (T.L.). The funders had no role in the design, analysis or writing of this manuscript.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Health Research Authority NRES Committee East of England-Cambridge Central approved the study in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All participants gave written informed consent. The Fenland Study has a dedicated Patient and Public Involvement panel, who provided input on the acceptability of the study protocols and participant data confidentiality. This study complied with the items listed in the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are available at request via the MRC Epidemiology website.