Abstract
The CDC recommended a booster dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech Comirnaty (BNT162b2) COVID-19 mRNA vaccine in September 2021 for high-risk individuals. Pregnant and high-risk lactating women were encouraged to receive the booster to obtain potential prolonged protection for themselves and their infants. This study investigated the ability of the booster vaccine to increase IgA and IgG antibodies specific to the receptor binding domain (RBD) of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in breast milk compared to levels pre-booster. We found a significant increase in both anti-RBD-specific IgA and IgG antibodies in breast milk following the Pfizer-BioNTech booster and this increase was present in the majority of participants at the study endpoint (60 days post-booster). These results suggest the booster enhances SARS-CoV-2 specific immunity in human breast milk, which may be protective for infants.
Background
The CDC recommended a booster dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech Comirnaty (BNT162b2) COVID-19 mRNA vaccine in September 2021 for people ages 65 and older, adults with underlying health conditions, and frontline workers1. Pregnant and lactating women in these groups were advised to consider the booster for potential prolonged protection for themselves and their infants. Previous studies reported an increase in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-specific IgG and IgA immunity in breast milk following the first and second doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine2–5. This study investigated the ability of the booster vaccine to increase IgA and IgG antibodies specific to the receptor binding domain (RBD) of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in breast milk compared to levels pre-booster.
Methods
Participants were prospectively recruited through social media posts in academic and regional mom groups. Participants needed to be lactating, must have received the standard two-dose Pfizer-BioNTech vaccination series at least 6-months prior, had no known diagnosis or suspected infection for COVID-19, and provide written informed consent. Changes in health status were monitored with a post-study survey. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Carthage College (IRB# 1817816-1).
Participants collected milk at 30-days and 1-day pre-booster, and 7-, 14-, 21-, 30-, 45-, and 60-days post-booster. 200 μl of blood was collected from each participant in January 2022 (≥60 days post-booster). Samples were stored at -20°C until analysis. The negative control was milk from July 2019.
Anti-RBD IgA and IgG levels were assessed via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Ancell Corp.). Blood from a COVID-19 positive patient was serially-diluted into negative control milk to generate a standard curve. IgA and IgG levels were converted to units/ml. A one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test was used to determine differences between the mean levels of IgA and IgG pre-booster (day -1) to all other time points. The significance threshold was p<0.05. Analyses were performed with Prism 7.
Results
12 women provided a total of 87 milk samples (Table). Women were a mean (SD) age of 35.45 (4.17) years and infants 3.58 (1.8) months at the time of booster. The mean (SD) time between the second dose of the vaccine and the booster was 7.01 (0.62) months. 91.67% of women reported a vaccine-related adverse event after the booster, with injection site soreness the most frequent event (75%). 58.33% of women had anti-RBD-specific IgA antibodies and 100% of women had anti-RBD-specific IgG antibodies in their blood at ≥60 days post-booster.
Anti-RBD-specific IgA antibodies in milk significantly increased by day 7; 71.43% of participants had an increased level at day 7 compared to pre-booster (day -1) (Figure). At day 60, 50% of participants had significantly increased RBD-specific IgA antibodies. Anti-RBD-specific IgG antibodies in milk significantly increased by day 14; 90% of participants had an increased level at day 14 compared to pre-booster (day -1). The anti-RBD-specific IgG levels remained significantly increased compared to the pre-booster level at 21 days, 45 days, and 60 days. 77.78%, 72.73%, 83.33% of participants had significantly increased IgG levels at 21, 45, and 60 days, respectively. On an individual level, 11/12 participants (91.67%) had a significant increase in RBD-specific IgA levels at one or more time points post-booster, whereas 12/12 (100%) had a significant increase in RBD-specific IgG at ≥2 time points post-booster (individual data not shown).
Discussion
We found a significant increase in anti-RBD-specific IgA and IgG antibodies in breast milk following the Pfizer-BioNTech booster. Other studies have reported high IgG levels in breast milk following the standard two-dose vaccination against SARS-CoV-22–4, and we observe a similar effect post-booster. Previous research suggests IgG in breast milk may be important for protection against viral infections6,7. Another study8 reported that the IgA and IgG antibodies induced following COVID-19 infection are capable of neutralizing SARS-CoV-2 in vitro, which suggests that the immunoglobulins induced following the booster vaccination may potentially offer enhanced protection for both the mother and infant.
Limitations
The sample size was limited and should be expanded to include participants from other races and ethnicities and an age range more representative of the average child-bearing population. No functional assays were performed to assess the protective activity of the immunoglobulins. This study did not assess immunoglobulins following a booster with the Moderna vaccine or a mix-and-match (Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, or Johnson & Johnson) approach to doses 1, 2, and the booster. Participants were not tested for SARS-CoV-2 via real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) as part of this study. However, no participants reported any known exposures to COVID-19 or any positive at-home or RT-PCR test results.
Data Availability
All data in the manuscript are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Additional Contributions
We thank Joan Donner and Paul Everson (Ancell Corp.) for technical assistance with the ELISA assays. Neither were compensated for their contributions.