Abstract
Background Data on social contact patterns are widely used to parameterise age-mixing matrices in mathematical models of infectious diseases designed to help understand transmission patterns or estimate intervention impacts. Despite this, little attention is given to how social contact data are collected and analysed, or how the types of contact most relevant for transmission may vary between different infections. In particular, the majority of studies focus on close contacts only – people spoken to face-to-face. This may be appropriate for infections spread primarily by droplet transmission, but it neglects the larger numbers of ‘shared air’ casual contacts who may be at risk from airborne transmission of pathogens such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis, measles, and SARS-CoV-2.
Methods We conducted social contact surveys in communities in two provinces of South Africa in 2019 (KwaZulu-Natal and Western Cape). In line with most studies, we collected data on people spoken to (close contacts). We also collected data on places visited and people present, allowing casual contact patterns to be estimated. Using these data, we estimated age mixing patterns relevant for i) droplet and ii) non-saturating airborne transmission. We also estimated a third category of pattern relevant for the transmission of iii) Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb), an airborne infection where saturation of household contacts plays an important role in transmission dynamics.
Results Estimated contact patterns by age did not vary greatly between the three transmission routes/infections, in either setting. In both communities, relative to other adult age groups, overall contact intensities were lower in 50+ year olds when considering contact relevant for non-saturating airborne transmission or the transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis than when considering contact relevant for droplet transmission.
Conclusions Our findings provide some reassurance that the widespread use of close contact data to parameterise age-mixing matrices for transmission models of airborne infections may not be resulting in major inaccuracies. The contribution of older age groups to transmission may be over-estimated, however. There is a need for future social contact surveys to collect data on casual contacts, to investigate whether our findings can be generalised to a wider range of settings, and to improve model predictions for infections with substantial airborne transmission.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This research is jointly funded by the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) and the UK Department for International Development (DFID) under the MRC/DFID Concordat agreement MR/P002404/1. The support of the Economic and Social Research Council (IK) is gratefully acknowledged. The project is partly funded by the Antimicrobial Resistance Cross Council Initiative supported by the seven research councils in partnership with other funders including support from the GCRF. Grant reference: ES/P008011/1. NM is additionally funded the Wellcome Trust (218261/Z/19/Z). RGW is funded by the Wellcome Trust (218261/Z/19/Z), NIH (1R01AI147321-01), EDTCP (RIA208D-2505B), UK MRC (CCF17-7779 via SET Bloomsbury), ESRC (ES/P008011/1), BMGF (OPP1084276, OPP1135288 & INV-001754), and the WHO (2020/985800-0).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical approval for the data collection in KwaZulu-Natal was granted by the Biomedical Research Ethics Committee (BREC) of the University of KwaZulu-Natal (BE662/17) and the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Observational / Interventions Research Ethics Committee (14640). Ethical approval for the data collection in Western Cape was granted by the Human Research Ethics Committee at the University of Cape Town (HREC/REF: 008/2018) and the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Observational / Interventions Research Ethics Committee (14520). Informed consent was obtained from all participants.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Analysis code and data are available from https://github.com/NickyMcC/CasualAgeMixing
