ABSTRACT
SARS-CoV-2 vaccines provide not just high protection against infection to the vaccinated individual but also provide indirect protection to its surroundings by blocking further transmission. Divergent results have been reported on the effectiveness of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Here, we argue that this divergence is due to the fact that the analyses did not take into account the indirect protection. Using a novel heterogenous infection model and real-world data, we demonstrate that heterogeneous vaccination rates among families and communities, and the study design that is used, may significantly skew the vaccine effectiveness estimations. We show that estimations of a vaccine with 85% effectiveness will vary between marked underestimation of ∼70% and overestimation of ∼95% depending on the number of interactions between vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
