Abstract
Background Complex disorders are caused by a combination of genetic, environmental and lifestyle factors, and their prevalence can vary greatly across different populations. Genome wide association studies (GWAS) can help identify common variants that underlie disease risk. However, despite their increasing number, the vast majority of studies focuses on European populations, leading to questions regarding the transferability of findings to non-Europeans. Here, we investigated whether polygenic risk scores (PRS) based on European GWAS correlate to disease prevalence within Europe and around the world.
Results GWAS summary statistics of 20 different disorders were used to estimate PRS in nine European and 24 worldwide reference populations. We estimated the correlation between average genetic risk for each of the 20 disorders and their prevalence in Europe and around the world. A clear variation in genetic risk was observed based on ancestry and we identified populations that have a higher genetic liability for developing certain disorders both within European and global regions. We also found significant correlations between worldwide disease prevalence and PRS for 13 of the studied disorders with obesity genetic risk having the highest correlation to disease prevalence. For these 13 disorders we also found that the loci used in PRS are significantly more conserved across the different populations compared to randomly selected SNPs as revealed by Fst and linkage disequilibrium structure.
Conclusion Our results show that PRS of world populations calculated based on European GWAS data can significantly capture differences in disease risk and identify populations with the highest genetic liability to develop various conditions. Our findings point to the potential transferability of European-based GWAS results to non-European populations and provide further support for the validity of GWAS.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Publicly available data was used in this study after obtaining appropriate access and IRB approval from Purdue University. Access to de-identified non-public datasets was approved by the IRB of each contributing site, Democritus University of Thrace and Purdue University.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
