Abstract
Recent research suggests that brain-heart interactions are associated with perceptual and self-consciousness. In this line, the neural responses to visceral inputs have been hypothesized to play a leading role in shaping our subjective experience. This study aims to investigate whether the contextual processing of auditory irregularities modulates both direct neuronal responses to the auditory stimuli (ERPs) and the neural responses to heartbeats, as measured with heartbeat-evoked responses (HERs). HERs were computed in patients with disorders of consciousness, diagnosed with a minimally conscious state or unresponsive wakefulness syndrome. We tested whether HERs reflect conscious auditory perception, which can potentially provide additional information for the consciousness diagnosis. EEG recordings were taken during the local-global paradigm, which evaluates the capacity of a patient to detect the appearance of auditory irregularities at local (short-term) and global (long-term) levels. The results show that local and global effects produce distinct ERPs and HERs, which can help distinguish between the minimally conscious state and unresponsive wakefulness syndrome patients. Furthermore, we found that ERP and HER responses were not correlated suggesting that independent neuronal mechanisms are behind them. These findings suggest that HER modulations in response to auditory irregularities, especially local irregularities, may be used as a novel neural marker of consciousness and may aid in the bedside diagnosis of disorders of consciousness with a more cost-effective option than neuroimaging methods.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
C.T.B. is supported by a senior fellowship from the Canadian Institute For Advance Research (CIFAR) program in Brain, Mind and Consciousness, as well as by ANR-17-EURE-0017. J.D.S. is supported by the Paris Brain Institute (France) and the program Investissements d'avenir ANR-10- IAIHU-06, by the CARNOT maturation grant, Title: Con&Heart to JDS, by a Sorbonne Universités EMERGENCE grant, title: Brain-body interactions, a new window for conscious evaluation in brain-injured patients, as well as a the PerBrain study funded by the European Union (ERA PerMed JTC2019 PerBrain). P.P. received support from a Sorbonne PhD grant (recherches interdisciplinaires émergentes, France).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was approved by the ethics committee of CPP Ile de France 1 (Paris, France). Informed consent was signed by the patients' legal representatives for approval of participation in the study, as required by the declaration of Helsinki.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Since one of the main concerns from reviewers and the editor was that healthy participants did not show an effect to the global effect, we have revised the inclusion criteria. In brief, the number of 'blocks' available in each participant varied to up to 12 blocks. We have set a threshold of at least 4 blocks (2 XX and 2 XY, as shown in Figure 1). With this new criterion, the new sets are 46 MCS and 40 UWS.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
