Abstract
Background CD20 depletion is a highly-effective treatment for relapsing multiple sclerosis that maintains B cells at low levels through six monthly dosing of 600mg ocrelizumab. This dosing schedule is associated with inhibition of seroconversion following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, in contrast to the high levels of seroconversion following treatment with alemtuzumab and cladribine tablets. A number of emerging reports suggest that repopulation of 1-3% B cells facilitates seroconversion after CD20-depletion. The frequency of this occurring following repeated ocrelizumab treatment, after other DMT, and after treatment cessation is largely unknown.
Methods Relapse data, lymphocyte and CD19 B cell numbers were extracted from phase II ocrelizumab extension study (NCT00676715) data supplied by the manufacturer via the Vivli Inc, trial data-request portal. Repopulation data of oral cladribine from the phase III CLARITY study (NCT00213135) was supplied by the European Medicines Agency; and the alemtuzumab phase III CARE-MS I (NCT00530348) and CARE-MS II (NCT00548405) trial data were supplied by the manufacturer via the clinicalstudydatarequest.com portal.
Results Only 3-5% of people with MS exhibit 1% B cells at 6 months after the last infusion following 3-4 cycles of ocrelizumab, compared to 50-55% at 9 months, and 85-90% at 12 months. During this time relapses occurred at consistent disease breakthrough rates compared to people during standard therapy. In contrast most people (90-100%) exhibited more than 1% B cells during treatment with either cladribine or alemtuzumab.
Conclusions Few people repopulate peripheral B cells with standard ocrelizumab dosing, however an extending the dosing interval by 3-6 months may allow many more people to potentially seroconvert in the relative absence of excess relapse-activity. Most people demonstrate B cell repletion within 3 months of the last treatment of alemtuzumab and cladribine. This may help protect against severe COVID-19.
Background
Therapeutic B cell targeting antibodies such as ocrelizumab and rituximab are used as a maintenance treatment for the control of multiple sclerosis (MS). Their efficacy may relate to either the direct long-term depletion of memory B cells and development of regulatory B cells within the regenerating CD19 population [Baker et al. 2020a] or indirectly through the blockade of T cell activity [Jelic et al. 2018]. Six-monthly dosing schedules, as used in MS, maintain continuous CD20+ B cell suppression in the periphery.
Given the blunted antibody response to other vaccines [Baker et al. 2020b] it is not surprising that CD20-depleting antibodies, notably rituximab and ocrelizumab, repeatedly and consistently appear to induce poor seroconversion following natural infection with SARS-CoV-2 [Louapre et al. 2021; Sormani et al. 2021a]. Furthermore, seroconversion in CD20-depleted, COVID-19 vaccinated individuals is universally poor [Achiron et al. 2021; Sormani et al. 2021b; Tallantyre et al. 2021]. In contrast many people treated with cladribine tablets and alemtuzumab after therapy show seroconversion following COVID-19 vaccination poor [Achiron et al. 2021; Sormani et al. 2021b; Tallantyre et al. 2021].
Whilst protection from MS may result from depletion of memory B cells [Baker et al. 2017a], seroconversion has been attributed to immature/naïve B cell repletion and occurs following the development of 1-3% B cell repopulation [Madelon et al. 2021; Mrak et al. 2021; Stefanski et al. 2021; Disanto et al. 2021]. However, the frequency of people achieving 1% B cell repletion at specific time intervals following ocrelizumab dosing is unknown. We hypothesised that it may require an extended-dose interval to achieve 1% peripheral B cell repopulation in at least 50%, given the median time of 60-72 weeks for B cells to recover to the lower limit of normal (80 cells/μl) following ocrelizumab infusion [Baker et al. 2020a].
Methods
Clinical Trials
Anonymised ocrelizumab and alemtuzumab data was provided by the trial sponsors following an independent panel review at clinincaltrialsdatarequest.com of the data analysis plans. Anonymized cladribine trial data was supplied by the European Medicines Agency, drug regulators. This analysis was not subject to further ethical review. However, the original trial protocols for data collection were reviewed and approved by the local review boards or ethics committees at each study centre for the ocrelizumab phase II trial [NCT00676715. 79 Centres], the phase III cladribine tablet study [NCT00213135. 155 centres] and the alemtuzumab [NCT00530348. 101 medical centres and NCT00548405. 194 Medical centres], phase III trials [Kappos et al. 2011, Giovannoni et al. 2010, Cohen et al. 2012, Coles et al. 2012]. The studies were performed in accordance with the International Conference on Harmonisation Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice and the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. All patients provided written informed consent [Kappos et al. 2011, Giovannoni et al. 2010, Cohen et al. 2012, Coles et al. 2012].
Data Access
Access to the Roche/Genentech phase II ocrelizumab extension trial in (NCT00676715) was requested (#5984) and supplied under contract by the Vivli, Inc managed portal. Data from people with relapsing MS who had received three or four 6-monthly cycles of 600mg ocrelizumab prior to an 18 month drug-free observation period were used. Lymphocyte and CD19+ numbers were collected during the 18 month drug-free follow up period [Baker et al. 2020a]. Trial data were interrogated using R software. A mixed effects logistic regression was fitted with a binary marker for CD19 count above 1% of total lymphocyte count as outcome. Repeated measures for each individual were included from last treatment to 18 months post-treatment. Included as covariates were: baseline body mass Index (BMI); time in years; quadratic term for time; arm of trial.
Lymphocyte numbers and CD19 peripheral counts information from the phase III (CLARITY) clinical trial of oral cladribine was supplied by the European Medicines Agency following a Freedom of Information request [Baker et al. 2017b]. Data relating to the 3.5mg/kg licenced dose was extracted. In addition, access to the Sanofi/Genzyme phase III alemtuzumab trials (NCT00530348/NCT00548405) trials [Baker et al. 2017c] was requested (#11529) and supplied under contract by the clinicalstudydatarequest.com portal. Lymphocyte and CD19 peripheral blood CD19 B cell data related to the licenced 12mg dose was extracted from the CARE-MS trials, using SAS software.
Results
3-5% of people had repopulated to 1-3% B cell count by the end of the standard dose interval of 6 months [Table 1]. At 9 months following treatment cessation there was 50-55% B cell repopulation, and at 12 months 85-90% B cells had repopulated to at least 1% B cells [Table 1, Figure 1]. This suggests that an extended-dosing interval may facilitate greater but not total seroconversion. During the treatment-free observation period between week 96 to week 108 there were 9 relapses (3 cycles) and 4 relapses) in people who received 4 cycles of treatment, which was comparable to 9/99 people relapsing (3 cycles) and 6/49 (4 cycles) during week 72-96 period on-standard treatment schedule (Table 1, Supplementary Figure 1 & 2). There was again evidence that baseline BMI was associated with CD19 re-population. For each increase in BMI of 5 units, the odds of having CD19 count above 1% of total lymphocyte count increased by 2.50 (95% confidence interval: 1.45-5.20; p=0.003) as suggested previously [Hauser et al. 2019; Signoriello et al. 2020].
In contrast to the persistent B cell depletion following ocrelizumab treatment (Table 1), the majority of people treated with either cladribine tablets (Table 2) or alemtuzumab (Table 3) maintained 1% B cell levels and also developed at least 10-20 CD19 B cells/μl in contrast to levels detected after ocrelizumab (Table 1-3). B cell depletion was most marked about after the second set of treatments during the cladribine treatment cycle (Table 2). Depletion was evident within the first month of alemtuzumab treatment followed by rapid repopulation (Table 3)
Discussion
During the COVID-19 pandemic ocrelizumab infusions were delayed by 1-3 months, with no major rebound in disease activity, suggesting the safety of an extended interval dosing scheme [Maarouf et al. 2020; Rolfes et al. 2021; van Lierop et al. 2021]. The importance of mounting a sterilising response relates not only to clinical severity of infection [Khoury et al. 2021], but also that immunosuppressed individuals may harbour prolonged SARS-CoV-2 infection allowing serial mutations to develop, impacting on infectivity and immune escape [Corey et al. 2021].
Given the importance of neutralizing antibody responses [Khoury et al. 2021], and the finding that protective antibody titres subside over time, COVID-19 breakthrough can and will occur. This is already seen in vaccinated, healthy individuals [Shrotri et al. 2021]. As CD20-treated individuals produce lower titre antibody responses than untreated controls [Achiron et al. 2021; Sormani et al. 2021b; Tallantyre et al. 2021], they are potentially in particular need of effective booster (third cycle) vaccinations. Whilst these may increase seroconversion in some immunocompromised people, it is possible that CD20 depletion will inhibit this response [Connolly et al. 2021; Greenberger et al. 2021]. A solution may be to provide a high-titre antibody response through monoclonal antibody cocktails or use of convalescent sera in high risk individuals [Hurt & Wheatley 2021]. However, maximising the change of an effective response to vaccination in immunosuppressed people is a priority. It is evident that CD19 B cells recover rapidly following cladribine and alemtuzumab (Baker et al. 2017b, Baker et al. 2017c) and this is consistent with a robust COVID-vaccine response in most people if vaccination in undertaken once immune reconstitution occurs [Achiron et al. 2021; Sormani et al. 2021b; Tallentyre et al. 2021]. However based on the B cell repopulation kinetics and poor vaccine response, we argue that delaying treatment for a short period to facilitate the most-effective booster programme possible is likely to be a justifiable risk. However, unless studies are conducted it may be too late to inform on and optimize the next stage of vaccination process/COVID-19 control in immunosuppressed people.
Data Availability
All trial data is available via the Vivli.Inc and Clinicalstudydatarequest.com portals which are provided under agreement with the data providers.
Funding
This study received no funding
Conflicts of Interest
DB, KS, GG RB, have received compensation for consultancy/educational activity from Roche/Genentech, Merck, and/or Sanofi/Genzyme who manufacture COVID-19 and MS drugs discussed in this study. These were not involved in the content or the decision to publish. AM, AK have nothing relevant to declare. Although considered irrelevant DB, KS, GG, RB have received compensation for consultancy/educational activity from all companies manufacturing licenced disease modifying agents in the MS space.
Data Availability
Data is available via the Vivli.Inc and Clinicalstudydatarequest.com portals which are provided under agreement with the trial sponsors.
Acknowledgments
This publication is in part based on research using data from data contributors Roche and Sanofi that has been made available through Vivli, Inc and Clinicalstudydatarequest.com. Clinicalstudydatarequest.com and Vivli have not contributed to or approved, and are not in any way responsible for, the contents of this publication. Data analysis, interpretation and conclusions made are independent from Roche, Sanofi and Merck.