ABSTRACT
Purpose Recent advances in computational image analysis offer the opportunity to develop automatic quantification of histologic parameters as aid tools for practicing pathologists. This work aims to develop deep learning (DL) models to quantify non-sclerotic and sclerotic glomeruli on frozen sections from donor kidney biopsies.
Approach A total of 258 whole slide images (WSI) from cadaveric donor kidney biopsies performed at our institution (n=123) and at external institutions (n=135) were used in this study. WSIs from our institution were divided at the patient level into training and validation datasets (Ratio: 0.8:0.2) and external WSIs were used as an independent testing dataset. Non-sclerotic (n=22767) and sclerotic (n=1366) glomeruli were manually annotated by study pathologists on all WSIs. A 9-layer convolutional neural network based on the common U-Net architecture was developed and tested for the segmentation of non-sclerotic and sclerotic glomeruli. DL-derived, manual segmentation and reported glomerular count (standard of care) were compared.
Results The average Dice Similarity Coefficient testing was 0.90 and 0.83. and the F1, Recall, and Precision scores were 0.93, 0.96, and 0.90, and 0.87, 0.93, and 0.81, for non-sclerotic and sclerotic glomeruli, respectively. DL-derived and manual segmentation derived glomerular counts were comparable, but statistically different from reported glomerular count.
Conclusions DL segmentation is a feasible and robust approach for automatic quantification of glomeruli. This work represents the first step toward new protocols for the evaluation of donor kidney biopsies.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the Nephcure foundation and by Duke University institutional funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study was approved by the Duke University Institutional Review Board.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The raw data for this study can be obtained through correspondence with the corresponding authors.
