ABSTRACT
Background The tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) plays a key role in occurrence, progression and prognosis of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the genetic and epigenetic alterations and potential mechanisms in the TIME of CRC are still unclear.
Methods We investigated the immune-related differences in three types of genetic or epigenetic alterations (gene expression, somatic mutation, and DNA methylation) and considered the potential roles that these alterations have in the immune response and the immune-related biological processes by analyzing the multi-omics data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) portal. Additionally, a four-step method based on LASSO regression and Cox regression was used to construct the prognostic prediction model. Cross validation was performed to validate the model.
Results A total of 1,745 differentially expressed genes, 178 differentially mutated genes and 1,961 differentially methylation probes were identified between the high-immunity group and the low-immunity group. We retained 15 genetic and epigenetic variables after using LASSO regression and Cox regression. For the prognostic predictions on the TCGA profiles, the performance of the model with 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year areas under the curve (AUCs) equal to 0.861, 0.797, and 0.875. Finally, the overall risk score model was constructed based on genetic, epigenetic, demographic and clinical characteristics, which comprised 18 variables and achieved a high degree of accuracy on the 1-year (AUC = 0.865), 3-year (AUC = 0.839), and 5-year (AUC = 0.914) survival predictions. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated that the overall survival of the high-risk group was significantly poorer compared with the low-risk group. Prognostic nomogram, calibration plot and cross validation showed excellent predictive performance.
Conclusions Our study provides a new clue to explore the TIME of CRC patients in genetic and epigenetic aspects. Meanwhile, the prognostic model also has clinical prognostic value and may provide new indicators for the treatment of CRC patients.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was supported by grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (81673271, 81573246, and 81973147), Cheeloo Young Scholars Program of Shandong University, Shandong University multidisciplinary research and innovation team of young scholars (2020QNQT11 and IFYT18034). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
No required IRB
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
The authors do not have any conflict of interest.
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos