Abstract
Background and Objective Recurrent attentive non-invasive observation of intestinal inflammation is essential for the proper management of Crohn’s disease (CD). The goal of this study was to develop and evaluate a multimodal machine-learning (ML) model to assess ileal CD endoscopic activity by integrating information from Magnetic Resonance Enterography (MRE) and biochemical biomarkers.
Methods We obtained MRE, biochemical and ileocolonoscopy data from the multi-center ImageKids study database. We developed an optimized multimodal fusion ML model to non-invasively assess terminal ileum (TI) endoscopic disease activity in CD from MRE data. We determined the most informative features for model development using a permutation feature importance technique. We assessed model performance in comparison to the clinically recommended linear-regression MRE model in an experimental setup that consisted of stratified 2-fold validation, repeated 50 times, with the ileocolonoscopy-based Simple Endoscopic Score for CD at the TI (TI SES-CD) as a reference. We used the predictions’ mean-squared-error (MSE) and the receiver operation characteristics (ROC) area under curve (AUC) for active disease classification (TI SEC-CD≥3) as performance metrics.
Results 121 subjects out of the 240 subjects in the ImageKids study cohort had all required information (Non-active CD: 62 [51%], active CD: 59 [49%]). Length of disease segment and normalized biochemical biomarkers were the most informative features. The optimized fusion model performed better than the clinically recommended model determined by both a better median test MSE distribution (7.73 vs. 8.8, Wilcoxon test, p<1e-5) and a better aggregated AUC over the folds (0.84 vs. 0.8, DeLong’s test, p<1e-9).
Conclusions Optimized ML models for ileal CD endoscopic activity assessment have the potential to enable accurate and non-invasive attentive observation of intestinal inflammation in CD patients. The presented model will be made available to the community through a dedicated website upon acceptance.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
NCT01881490
Funding Statement
MCG : AbbVie research grant and honoraria (disclosure, no conflict)
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The imageKids study has been approved by the Helsinki committee of the Israeli Ministry of Health. Since all identifying elements related to patient privacy have been removed from the database used in the research presented in this manuscript, it does not need to provide an additional approval of ethics committee.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
updated author email
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to restrictions e.g. they contain information that could compromise the privacy of research participants
