Abstract
Introduction The aim of this study was to describe the characteristics and outcomes of remote-dwelling pregnant people with threatened labour referred for aeromedical retrieval to a regional birthing centre, as well as factors associated with birth within 48 hours.
Methods This was a retrospective observational study of all pregnant people in the remote Central Australian region referred to the Medical Retrieval Consultation and Coordination Centre for labour >23 weeks gestation, between 12 February 2018 – 12 February 2020. Data was extracted manually from written medical records on maternal, neonatal and retrieval mission characteristics. Univariate and multivariate statistical analysis was performed.
Results There were 116 people referred for retrieval for labour. There were no births during transport and less than half of the cases in this cohort resulted in birth within 48 hours of retrieval. Tocolysis was frequently used. Predictors of birth with 48 hours were cervical dilatation 5cm or more, preterm gestational age and ruptured membranes in the univariate analysis. Nearly one-third of this cohort required intervention or had complications during birth.
Discussion Birth during transport for threatened labour did not occur in this cohort, and more than half of retrievals did not result in birth within 48 hours, however the high risk of birth complications may offset any benefit of avoiding aeromedical transport from remote regions. Retrieval clinicians should have a lower threshold for urgent transfer in cases of ruptured membranes, cervical dilatation of 5cm or more, or gestational age is less than 37 weeks.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Central Australian Human Research Ethics Committee gave ethical approval for this work (CA-20-3812).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Spelling error corrected in affiliated institution for 2 authors
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
