Abstract
INTRODUCTION Dementia assessment includes cognitive and behavioral testing with informant validation. Conventional testing is resource intensive, with uneven access. Online unsupervised assessments could reduce barriers to risk assessment. We interrogated the relationship between informant-rated behavioral changes and neuropsychological test performance in older adults in the Brain Health Registry.
METHODS Participants completed online unsupervised cognitive tests, and informants completed the Mild Behavioral Impairment Checklist via a Study Partner portal. Cognitive performance was evaluated in MBI+/- individuals, as was the association between cognitive scores and MBI symptom severity.
RESULTS Mean age of the 499 participants was 67, 61% of which were female. MBI+ participants had lower working memory and executive function test scores. Lower cognitive test scores associated with greater MBI burden.
DISCUSSION Our findings support the feasibility of remote, informant-reported behavioral assessment and support its validity by demonstrating a relationship to cognitive test performance using online unsupervised assessments for dementia risk assessment.
Systematic review The authors searched MEDLINE and Google Scholar for studies linking Mild Behavioral Impairment (MBI) and cognition in non-demented older adults. Most studies have utilized transformed Neuropsychiatric Inventory scores to assess MBI, and relatively few using the novel MBI-checklist (MBI-C), with the largest study using self-report. Exploration of informant reports of MBI is important due to impaired insight that may accompany neuropsychiatric symptoms.
Interpretation Older adults with online, informant reported MBI had poorer performance in memory and executive function measured using online neuropsychological testing compared to those without MBI. These findings are consistent with the current literature and suggest that the MBI-C may serve as a marker for poorer cognitive performance.
Future directions Our data support the role of online testing of cognition and behavior for risk assessment. This approach to evaluate behavior and cognition can be explored further, to determine if it is a scalable, online approach to detection of neurodegenerative disease.
Competing Interest Statement
ZI is funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, and has received consulting fees/honoraria from Otsuka/Lundbeck, outside the submitted work. His institution has received funds from Acadia, Biogen, Roche, and Sunovion, also outside the submitted work. RLN is a co-investigator for the BHR. RSM has received grant funding from the National Institute of Mental Health and has received research support from Johnson & Johnson. MWW receives support for his work from the following: National Institute of Health, Department of Defense, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, California Department of Public Health, University of Michigan, Siemens, Biogen, Larry L Hillbolm Foundation, Alzheimer's Association, The State of California, Johnson & Johnson, Kevin and Connie Shanahan, GE, Vrije Universiteit Medical Center Amsterdam, Australian Catholic University, The Stroke Foundation and the Veterans Administration. He has served on the Advisory Boards for Eli Lilly, Cerecin/Accera, Roche, Alzheon Inc and BHR.
Funding Statement
No external funding was received.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study reported here was conducted in accordance with the Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki) for experiments involving humans. All participants provided online consent before completing assessments. The Brain Health Registry is approved by the UCSF IRB.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data used in the manuscript is used from the Brain Health Registry online platform.
