Abstract
Background COVID-19 has restricted singing in communal worship. We sought to understand variations in droplet transmission and the impact of wearing face masks.
Methods Using rapid laser planar imaging, we measured droplets while participants exhaled, said ‘hello’ or ‘snake’, sang a note or ‘Happy Birthday’, with and without surgical face masks. We measured mean velocity magnitude (MVM), time averaged droplet number (TADN) and maximum droplet number (MDN). Multilevel regression models were used.
Results In 20 participants, sound intensity was 71 Decibels (dB) for speaking and 85 dB for singing (p<0.001). MVM was similar for all tasks with no clear hierarchy between vocal tasks or people and >85% reduction wearing face masks. Droplet transmission varied widely, particularly for singing. Masks decreased TADN by 99% (p<0.001) and MDN by 98% (p<0.001) for singing and 86-97% for other tasks. Masks reduced variance by up to 48%. When wearing a mask, neither singing task transmitted more droplets than exhaling.
Conclusions Wide variation exists for droplet production. This significantly reduced when wearing face masks. Singing during religious worship wearing a face mask appears as safe as exhaling or talking. This has implications for UK public health guidance during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Grant funding from Wellcome Trust and EPSRC through the Wellcome / EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS) (203145Z/16/Z). LBL is supported by the National Institute for Health Research University College London (UCL) Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre. MKT acknowledges the Royal Society Wolfson Fellowship and the NICEDROPS project supported by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement no. 714712.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical approval for the study was obtained from University College London Ethics Committee (Approval: 14223/002).
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Funding: Wellcome Trust and EPSRC
Data Availability
Data from the study is available on request from the corresponding author. This may be subject to a data access request agreement.
