Abstract
Restricting in-person interactions is an important technique for limiting the spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). Although early research found strong associations between cell phone mobility and infection spread during the initial outbreaks in the United States, it is unclear whether this relationship persists across locations and time. We propose an interpretable statistical model to identify spatiotemporal variation in the association between mobility and infection rates. Using one year of US county-level data, we found that sharp drops in mobility often coincided with declining infection rates in the most populous counties in spring 2020. However, the association varied considerably in other locations and across time. Our findings are sensitive to model flexibility, as more restrictive models average over local effects and mask much of the spatiotemporal variation. We conclude that mobility does not appear to be a reliable leading indicator of infection rates, which may have important policy implications.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
No external funding was received
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The source data used in this work are openly available and can be accessed without application, or screening, or registration for access.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
We use publicly available data for county-level temperature, Covid-19 case counts, mask usage, Google mobility data, SafeGraph mobility data, and county population. SafeGraph mobility data and CMU mask usage surveys were openly available through the Delphi Epidata API (https://cmu-delphi.github.io/delphi-epidata/api/covidcast.html). All other data were openly available for direct download (https://goo.gle/covid-19-open-data, https://github.com/nytimes/covid-19-data, https://github.com/nychealth/coronavirus-data, https://github.com/nytimes/covid-19-data/tree/master/mask-use, https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/06/23/most-americans-say-they-regularly-wore-a-mask-in-stores-in-the-past-month-fewer-see-others-doing-it, https://www.google.com/covid19/mobility/, https://github.com/JieYingWu/COVID-19USCountylevelSummaries/tree/master/data).
https://goo.gle/covid-19-open-data
https://github.com/nytimes/covid-19-data
https://github.com/nychealth/coronavirus-data
https://github.com/nytimes/covid-19-data/tree/master/mask-use
https://www.google.com/covid19/mobility/
https://github.com/JieYingWu/COVID-19USCountylevelSummaries/tree/master/data
https://cmu-delphi.github.io/delphi-epidata/api/covidcast-signals/safegraph.html
https://cmu-delphi.github.io/delphi-epidata/api/covidcast-signals/fb-survey.html#behavior-indicators
