Abstract
Many rare syndromes can be well described and delineated from other disorders by a combination of characteristic symptoms. These phenotypic features are best documented with terms of the human phenotype ontology (HPO), which is increasingly used in electronic health records (EHRs), too. Many algorithms that perform HPO-based gene prioritization have also been developed, however, the performance of many such tools suffers from an overrepresentation of atypical cases in the medical literature. This is certainly the case if the algorithm cannot handle features that occur with reduced frequency in a disorder. With CADA we built a knowledge-graph that is based on case annotations and disorder annotations and show that CADA exhibits superior performance particularly for patients that present with the pathognomonic findings of a disease. Crucial in the design of our approach is the use of the growing amount of phenotypic information that diagnostic labs deposit in databases such as ClinVar. By this means CADA is an ideal reference tool for differential diagnostics in rare disorders that can also be updated regularly.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Institutionally funded
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Data is anonymized and therefore exempt from IRB approval Answer of oversight body in Translation: Dear colleague Mr. Krawitz, if the Data, that is provided to you, is fully anonymous, it is in my opinion not necessary to consult with the Ethics-Council. Best Regards, Kurt Racke Univ.-Prof. Dr. med. Kurt Racke Head of the Ethics-Council Med. Fak. Univ. Bonn Venusberg Campus I (ehemals Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25) Geb. 02 (Auenbrugger Haus) D-53105 Bonn
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All Data used in this study can be found in the corresponding github repository.
