Abstract
Retrospective analyses of interventions to epidemics, in which the effectiveness of strategies implemented are compared to hypothetical alternatives, are valuable for performing the cost-benefit calculations necessary to optimize infection countermeasures. SIR (susceptible-infected-removed) models are useful in this regard but are limited by the challenge of deciding how and when to update the numerous parameters as the epidemic changes in response to population behaviors. We present a method that uses a “dynamic spread function” to systematically capture the continuous variation in the population behavior, and the gradual change in infection dynamics, resulting from interventions. No parameter updates are made by the user. We use the tool to quantify the reduction in infection rate realizable from the population of New York City adopting different facemask strategies during COVID-19. Assuming a baseline facemask of 67% filtration efficiency, calculations show that increasing the efficiency to 75% could reduce the roughly 5000 new infections per day occurring at the peak of the epidemic to 3000. Mitigation strategies that may not be varied as part of the retrospective analysis, such as social distancing, are automatically captured as part of the calibration of the dynamic spread function.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was internally funded by the FDA.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
No IRB approval was required
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Jenna.osborn{at}fda.hhs.gov
Sberma13{at}terpmail.umd.edu
Sara.benderbier{at}gmail.com
Gavin.dsouza{at}fda.hhs.gov
Matthew.myers{at}fda.hhs.gov
Data Availability
No human, animal, or in-vitro data is included in the manuscript, which describes a risk-assessment model. Algorithms used to derive the mathematical results have been referenced.
