Abstract
The Czech Republic (or Czechia) is facing the second wave of COVID-19 epidemic, with the rate of growth in the number of confirmed cases (among) the highest in Europe. Learning from the spring first wave, when many countries implemented interventions that effectively stopped national economics (i.e., a form of lockdown), political representations are now unwilling to do that again, at least until really necessary. Therefore, it is necessary to look back and assess efficiency of each of the first wave restrictions, so that interventions can now be more finely tuned. We develop an age-structured model of COVID-19 epidemic, distinguish several types of contact, and divide the population into 206 counties. We calibrate the model by sociological and population movement data and use it to analyze the first wave of COVID-19 epidemic in Czechia, through assessing effects of applied restrictions as well as exploring functionality of alternative intervention schemes that were discussed later. To harness various sources of uncertainty in our input data, we apply the Approximate Bayesian Computation framework. We found that (1) personal protective measures as face masks and increased hygiene are more effective than reducing contacts, (2) delaying the lockdown by four days led to twice more confirmed cases, (3) implementing personal protection and effective testing as early as possible is a priority, and (4) tracing and quarantine or just local lockdowns can effectively compensate for any global lockdown if the numbers of confirmed cases not exceedingly high.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
VT was supported by the QuantiXLie Center of Excellence, a project cofinanced by the Croatian Government and European Union through the European Regional Development Fund - the Competitiveness and Cohesion Operational Programme (KK.01.1.1.01.0004).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This is a modelling study that used anonymized data on COVID-19 patients so that no ethics committee approvals are necessary. The use of these data was approved by The Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data used in the manuscript were either taken from the letarture or provided by state institutions of the Czech Republic. In the latter case, they are not publicly avilable, but are acknowledged in the manuscript. The software code used to run the model is available (without publicly unavailable data) on reasonable request.
