Abstract
Introduction This study investigated the effects of seating distance and orientation on engagement in novice and experienced learners in a large classroom explicitly designed for Team-based Learning (TBL). Learning what affects TBL engagement may improve its implementation.
Methods Participants were novice first-year and experienced second-year undergraduate medical students in Singapore (male=103, female=57). Their age ranged from 18 to 23 (M=19.5, SD=1.06). This quasi-experimental study considered two factors. Firstly, the distance from the teams’ table to the tutor’s table. Secondly, students’ orientation at each table, with either their front or back facing the tutor. Engagement was measured using two instruments, Situational Cognitive Engagement Measure and Classroom Engagement Survey at two TBL sessions – before and after swapping seating arrangements.
Results For experienced students, seating distance did not significantly affect engagement (p=0.08–0.89). Novice student’s engagement levels decreased significantly for those who moved further; M=3.30 to 2.98 (p=0.009–0.023). However, overall engagement also decreased post-swap regardless of direction moved; M=3.26 to 3.00 (p=0.004). For both cohorts, seating orientation did not significantly affect engagement (p=0.07–0.62). Those unaffected by seating arrangement commended the classroom’s design, such as screens all around and quality audio-visual system. Novice students exhibited a stronger preference to sit nearer to the tutor than experienced students. Both groups preferred sitting with their front- facing the tutor.
Discussion Within specially designed TBL classrooms, seating distance and orientation did not significantly affect engagement. Technologically enhanced team-centric spaces provide a favorable environment for TBL, though students’ preferences for seats may change with more TBL experience.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
No external funding was received.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Nanyang Technological University [2019-06-036].
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All relevant data referred to is available in the tables of the manuscript. A full data set is in the possession of the authors.
