ABSTRACT
Background Anterior knee pain (AKP) is commonly diagnosed in military members and is a threat to operational readiness. AKP includes a range of conditions, with localized pain around the patella being a frequent location of pain and disability. Mechanical overuse is one suggested etiology for many of these conditions, suggesting occupational demands in the military may influence AKP frequency amongst the service members. Previous research suggests females are at a greater risk for AKP, however, it is unknown how occupation affects AKP risk.
Study Design Epidemiological cohort.
Level of Evidence Level 2.
Methods The Defense Medical Epidemiology Database was queried for the number of individuals with ICD-9 diagnosis codes on their initial encounter from 2006 to 2015. Diagnoses were categorized into anterior or retropatellar pain, patellar instability, knee tendinopathy, as well the sum of the three groups which was defined as AKP. Relative risk (RR) and chi-square statistics were calculated in the assessment of sex and occupational category. Regressions were calculated to determine association between service branch, sex, and AKP across time.
Results From 2006-2018, a total of 151, 263 enlisted and 14,335 officer services members were diagnosed with AKP. The incidence rate was 13.2 in enlisted members and 6.2 in in officers. Females were significantly at greater risk of developing AKP compared to males within both the enlisted (relative risk=1.32) and officer (relative risk=2.01) service members. Differences in risk were also noted across military occupation for both enlisted and officer service members, p<.05.
Conclusion Sex and military occupation were salient factors for AKP risk. Evaluation of training requirements and developing interventions programs across military occupation could serve as a focus for future research aiming to decrease the incidence of chronic knee pain.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The authors are military service members or employees of the U.S. Government. This work was prepared as part of their official duties.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study protocol was approved by the Naval Health Research Center Institutional Review Board in compliance with all applicable Federal regulations governing the protection of human subjects. Research data were derived from an approved Naval Health Research Center Institutional Review Board protocol, number NHRC.2020.0203-NHSR.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
