ABSTRACT
Non-pharmaceutical interventions, such as social distancing and lockdowns, remain the most viable measure to control the COVID-19 pandemic. Localized lockdowns in small geographic areas have become an important policy intervention to prevent viral spread in cases of resurgence. These localized lockdowns can result in lower social and economic costs compared to larger-scale suppression strategies. In this paper, we adopt a novel approach from the causal inference literature and estimate the effect of localized lockdowns using augmented synthetic controls. Utilizing a rich integrated dataset from Chile, we estimated the direct and indirect causal effects of localized lockdowns on SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Our results show that the effects of localized lockdowns are strongly modulated by their duration and are affected by indirect effects from neighboring geographic areas that are not under lockdown. Our estimations suggest that extending localized lockdowns will slow down the epidemic. However, by themselves, localized lockdowns will be insufficient to control epidemic growth due to indirect effects from neighboring areas unless those contiguous areas also implement lockdowns. These results provide critical empirical evidence about the effectiveness of localized lockdowns in interconnected geographic areas.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was partially supported by a grant from the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (G-2018-10118), an award from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI; ME-2019C1-16172), and the ANID Millennium Science Initiative/ Millennium Initiative for Collaborative Research on Bacterial Resistance, MICROB-R NCN17_081, and ANID/FONDAP CIGIDEN 15110017. The funders had no role in study design, data collection, and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Our research uses only publicly available data collected by the Chilean government; subjects cannot be identified directly or through identifiers. It is considered exempt by the Comite Etico Cientifico of Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Paper in collection COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2 preprints from medRxiv and bioRxiv
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
1
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos