ABSTRACT
Non-pharmaceutical interventions, such as social distancing and lockdowns, have been essential to control the COVID-19 pandemic. In particular, localized lockdowns in small geographic areas have become an important policy intervention to prevent viral spread in cases of resurgence. These localized lockdowns can result in lower social and economic costs compared to larger-scale suppression strategies. Using an integrated dataset from Chile (March 3 through June 15, 2020) and a novel synthetic control approach, in this paper we estimate the effect of localized lockdowns, disentangling its direct and indirect causal effects on SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Our results show that the effects of localized lockdowns are strongly modulated by their duration and are influenced by indirect effects from neighboring geographic areas. Our estimates suggest that extending localized lockdowns can slow down the pandemic; however, localized lockdowns on their own are insufficient to control pandemic growth in the presence of indirect effects from contiguous neighboring areas that do not have lockdowns. These results provide critical empirical evidence about the effectiveness of localized lockdowns in interconnected geographic areas.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was partially supported by a grant from the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (G-2018-10118), an award from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI; ME-2019C1-16172), and the ANID Millennium Science Initiative/ Millennium Initiative for Collaborative Research on Bacterial Resistance, MICROB-R NCN17_081, and ANID/FONDAP CIGIDEN 15110017. The funders had no role in study design, data collection, and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Our research uses only publicly available data collected by the Chilean government; subjects cannot be identified directly or through identifiers. It is considered exempt by the Comite Etico Cientifico of Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
email: yige_li{at}hcp.med.harvard.edu.
email: eundurra{at}uc.cl.
email: zubizarreta{at}hcp.med.harvard.edu.
We had an English native speaker check the writing. We made minor changes in the introduction and discussion for added clarity. Last, we updated the organization of figures (separated panels, legend in a separate box, no titles within the figures) and the figure legends for clarity.
Data Availability
Datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from Base de Datos CoVID-19 repository, Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnologia, Conocimiento, e Innovacion.
