Abstract
Purpose Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) are simplified computational models simulating the central nervous system. They are widely applied in medicine, since they substantially increase the sensitivity and specificity of the diagnosis, classification and the prognosis of a medical condition. In this study we constructed an artificial neural network to evaluate several parameters of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL), such as the outcome and safety of the procedure.
Materials and methods Patients with urinary lithiasis suitable for ESWL treatment were enrolled. An artificial neural network (ANN) was designed and a unique algorithm was executed with the use of the well-known numerical computing environment, MATLAB. Medical data were collected from all patients and 12 nodes were used as inputs (sex, age, B.M.I. (Body Mass Index), stone location, stone size, comorbidity, previous ESWL sessions, analgesia, number of shockwaves, shockwave intensity, presence of a ureteral stent and hydronephrosis). Conventional statistical analysis was also performed.
Results 716 patients were finally included in our study. Univariate analysis revealed that diabetes and hydronephrosis were positively correlated to the ESWL complications. Regarding efficacy, univariate analysis revealed that stone location, stone size, the number and density of shockwaves delivered and the presence of a stent in the ureter were independent factors of the ESWL outcome. This was further confirmed when adjusted for sex and age in a multivariate analysis.The performance of the ANN (predictive/real values) at the end of the training state reached 98,72%. The four basic ratios (sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV) were calculated for both training and evaluation data sets. The performance of the ANN at the end of the evaluation state was 81,43%.
Conclusions Our ANN achieved high score in predicting the outcome and the side effects of the extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy treatment for urinary stones. In fact, the accuracy of the network may further improve by using larger sets of data, different architecture in designing the model or using different set of input variables, making ANNs thus, a quite promising instrument for effective, precise and swift medical diagnosis.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
No funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
N/A
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The data are available by last author
