What factors influence symptom reporting during an emerging infectious disease outbreak? A rapid review of the evidence

Search strategy

We developed a search strategy which included medical subject headings and free text terms. Key words for the search included terms for epidemics/pandemics (including coronavirus, avian influenza, Ebola, Middle East respiratory syndrome, severe acute respiratory syndrome, swine flu) and terms characterizing symptom reporting (including help-seeking behaviour, symptom reporting, stigma, requesting/asking for a test). Three electronic databases (Medline, PsycINFO, ProQuest) were searched from inception to June 2020, the full list of search terms can be found in Appendix A.

Selection criteria

For studies to be included in this review, they had to: report on primary research; be published in a peer-reviewed journal; be written in English; include factors associated with reporting symptoms to a healthcare unit, or accessing healthcare (i.e. facilitators, barriers, or features associated with the reporting of symptoms or accessing of healthcare) and include participants with experience of a major health incident, which had to be viral, contagious and not sexually transmitted. Citations from each database search were downloaded into EndNote and duplicates removed. Titles and abstracts of identified studies were screened by two reviewers for inclusion against criteria, until a good inter-rater reliability had been observed (percentage agreement =>90%). Initially 10% of references were double-screened, and as inter-rater agreement was good (98%), the remaining references were screened by one reviewer. All primary-level studies included after the first screen of citations were acquired in full and re-evaluated for eligibility (see Appendix B for studies that were excluded at full-text review).

Data extraction and synthesis

Data extraction and synthesis was conducted independently by two reviewers, and discrepancies or difficulties with coding were resolved through discussion. Quality of each included study was assessed using the CASP (Critical Appraisals Skills Programme) Qualitative checklist for qualitative studies (17) or the BMJ Critical appraisal checklist for survey studies (18). A quality rating was assigned to each study, where ++ indicates that most (≥75%) or all of the checklist criteria have been met, + indicates that the checklist criteria have been partially met (≥50%-75%), and – indicates that the majority of checklist criteria have not been met (<50%). Thematic synthesis was used to inductively identify emerging themes in qualitative findings across studies. Themes from individual studies were integrated into a wider context, with overarching categories of themes and subthemes being developed. Themes were derived from the data presented within the included studies, emerging themes were placed into a thematic map representing the relationship between the overarching categories, themes and subthemes. Narrative synthesis was used to combine and summarise the findings from survey studies, this was embedded within the context of the qualitative findings to provide an overall narrative of the data.

Included studies

The characteristics of the included studies are summarised in Table 1. Half the studies used qualitative methods (11, 19-25) and half used quantitative surveys (26-33).

The studies were conducted across 12 countries and included people with experience of the 2009 and 2010 H1N1 influenza pandemic (11, 24, 26, 27, 32), Ebola (20, 21, 23, 25, 33), avian influenza (29, 30), acute respiratory illness (22), influenza-like illness (28, 31) and any infectious disease (19).

Identified themes

Five themes were identified as facilitators of symptom reporting or accessing healthcare: accurate and informative communication; symptom severity; concern about exposure; ease of access; relationship with healthcare provider. Seven themes were identified as barriers of symptom reporting or accessing healthcare: lack of knowledge; fear; stigmatization; invasion of privacy; low concern about symptoms; economics; practicalities of attending healthcare facility. See Figure 2 and 3 for theme maps for facilitators and barriers of symptom reporting. These themes (and subthemes) are elaborated below. The synthesis of quantitative survey data also highlighted a number of demographic features associated with those reporting symptoms and those seeking healthcare, summarised below.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 2: Facilitators of symptom reporting theme map

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 3: Barriers of symptom reporting theme map

Accurate and informative communication

Participants found that education about symptoms (19, 21, 30, 31) and about routes of transmission enabled them to feel confident about reporting symptoms and seeking help. Participants emphasized that they would be happier to report symptoms if they understood the rationale behind reporting, and if their personal responsibility was emphasised (19):

“I think most people would be happy if they knew there was a risk, if you could tell them why you’re asking the questions.” ((19), pg. 9)

Participants also highlighted that having confidence that the reporting system was effective and efficient would facilitate reporting (19).

Symptom severity

Participants reported that the unusualness of symptoms, particularly in terms of severity and duration, were powerful prompts to access healthcare (11, 29)

“I’ve had a cold and I’ve had the flu and it only lasted about 2 days. But I had this for about a week and a half. It’s the first I’ve had a cold that long and I was just thinking the worst” ((11) pg. 3)

Early access to healthcare was also facilitated when people perceived the illness as dangerous (29, 30). Participants were more motivated to seek treatment earlier when the importance of early response was emphasised, and where exposure to survivors built hope about recovery (21, 29). Participants expressed the view that if they were confident that they were experiencing a genuine illness they would feel comfortable about disclosing symptoms (19).

Concern about exposure

Participants were motivated to seek advice if they were concerned or uncertain about exposure (11). Another related motivator was a desire to gain peace of mind (11). Furthermore, those with personal risk factors (including age and underlying health conditions) were particularly compelled to contact healthcare services (11). Social pressures also facilitated help-seeking behaviour, both in terms of fears about exposing others to the disease, and pressure from others to report symptoms (11).

Ease of access

The physical proximity of healthcare facilities and the importance that these were local and community-based was highlighted as facilitators to accessing healthcare as the people working in those facilities would be more likely to be known and trusted (20, 25). Being able to walk to facilities also resolved transportation issues from a practical perspective, and provided an emotional facilitating factor as many participants described an intense fear of ambulances (20, 22)

Relationship with healthcare provider

Participants were more likely to seek help if they were encouraged to do so by familiar and trusted healthcare professionals (20). Help-seeking behaviour was also facilitated through healthcare professional’s willingness to discuss symptoms and provide information (22). Conversely, having to contact a new and unknown healthcare provider was highlighted as a barrier that delayed the decision to seek healthcare (24).

Barriers of symptom reporting/accessing healthcare

Fear

Fear emerged as a recurrent barrier to symptom reporting, this included: fear of the what may happen if a person caught the disease, fear of receiving treatment, and of the treatment system (20); fear of being infected in a healthcare setting (23); fears of being sucked into the system that arose when people witnessed sick people being taken away and never returning (20, 25); fear of the hospital or clinic environment (24, 25, 33); fear of the reaction they may receive from the healthcare worker, i.e. of not being believed (19) or of being seen to make a fuss (33).

Stigmatisation

Participants anticipated stigmatization and the desire to avoid this created a barrier to reporting symptoms (19, 22, 23). People worried about experiencing stigma in the workplace, in the wider community, and were concerned about social stigma that may be attached to family members of those who had developed severe illness.

Invasion of privacy

Participants were wary that detailed questioning about symptoms could be experienced as an invasion of privacy and create or increase feelings of anxiety and distrust (19). The need for the protection of employee privacy and confidentiality was also raised, in the context of healthcare workers reporting symptoms (19).

Low concern about symptoms

Juxtaposed against the finding that concern about exposure could act as a facilitator to symptom reporting, others experienced low concern about symptoms and this acted as a barrier to help-seeking. For some people, this took the form of a fatalistic approach, with tests being perceived as pointless and disease inevitable (21), or the lack of an effective treatment delaying the decision to seek healthcare (24). Others just did not feel sufficiently ill to report symptoms or access healthcare (25, 29, 33):

“Because based on what the medical people say, if it is high fever, then you will say this has gone beyond limit. Because there are times when we get malaria and common cold before this Ebola. So you cannot just start feeling feverish and you say you have to call 117.” ((25) pg. 7)

Some participants believed that there was no need to access healthcare as they would get better on their own (22, 29), or preferred to try home-based healthcare as a first-line treatment option (23-25).

One study found that exposure to media coverage reduced worry and decreased healthcare service use. (32)

Economics

Economic barriers to accessing healthcare were also experienced, because participants could not afford healthcare (23-25), or were worried about a negative impact on their employment or had no paid sick leave (24).

Practicalities of attending a healthcare facility

For some people the healthcare facility was too far away to travel to (29), and a lack of transportation (23, 24, 29), or not being able to afford to travel (29) imposed practical barriers to accessing healthcare, particularly for those living in rural communities. Other practical barriers to help-seeking behaviour included: not having time to visit a healthcare facility (29); lacking childcare (29); and a language or communication barrier (24).

Associated features of those reporting symptoms

Three studies found that women were more likely to report symptoms than men (26, 28, 31), we cannot however, determine if this is because women were more likely to contract the illness. Two studies reported that older people (aged 65 years or over) were less likely to report symptoms than those who could be categorized as younger or middle-aged, although these age bands were large, covering 18 to 49 year olds (26) or 25-64 years (28). One study found that white participants were more likely to report symptoms than black participants (26). However, the relationship of ethnicity and reporting was more complex than all black and minority ethnic (BAME) groups being less likely to report symptoms, as the same study (26) found that American Indian/Alaska Native participants were more likely to report symptoms than white adults. Finally, two studies found that people with higher levels of education were more likely to report symptoms than those who had spent less time in education.

Associated features of those seeking healthcare

Two studies found that women were more likely to seek medical care than men (26, 31). In an opposite pattern to the reporting of symptoms, one study reported that those with primary level education or below were more likely to seek medical care than those with tertiary education or above (31). One study found that people from ethnic minority groups were more likely to access healthcare (32). Two studies reported that those with underlying health conditions (31, 32) were more likely to have sought medical care, and one of those studies also found that people living in larger households (Rubin 2010b) were more likely to access healthcare. Again, within this review we cannot determine if greater levels of seeking healthcare by these groups is due to an increased likelihood that they have contracted the illness. Finally, mixed results were reported across studies on the association between age and healthcare seeking behaviour, with two studies finding that older adults (aged at least 60 or 65 years) were more likely to seek healthcare (26, 31), and another study in which participants indicated that they felt too old to seek care (29). Another two studies found no direct association between age and help-seeking behaviour, but found relationships with other variables. One study reported a relationship between age and gender with males under the age of 25 being more likely to seek medical attention than women under the age of 25 (27). Another study reported a relationship between age and ethnicity, as for BAME respondents the longest duration between onset of symptoms and seeking initial treatment was found for an older age group, while for white respondents the longest duration was reported by children and young people (24).

Principal finding

The evidence within this review shows a number of distinct factors which can act as either facilitators or barriers to people reporting symptoms to, or seeking care from, the health services during an emerging infectious disease outbreak. These include fear or concern about exposure, knowledge & information, level of concern over symptoms, and practical considerations. Additional factors are related to invasion of privacy and stigmatisation. A number of demographic factors should also be considered, including sex, age, ethnicity and education.

Interpretation of results

Our thematic analysis identified four main themes which facilitate people either reporting symptoms or accessing health care facilities: symptom severity, concern about exposure, accurate and informative communication, relationship with health care provider and ease of access. For example when information is accurate, and communicated effectively people understand why they need to report symptoms, and feel enabled to do so (19), whereas when people have a poor understanding, either about testing, the disease, or disease symptoms they appear reluctant to visit a healthcare facility or report symptoms (20, 25). Public health officials need to ensure people receive appropriate information, working with the media, who during major health crisis play an important role (34). Calls for good communication are, of course, nothing new in the field of emergency response. However, we make no apologies for raising it once more. Without sustained effort on the part of official communicators, knowledge among the public can be surprisingly low. For example, five months into the COVID-19 pandemic only 59% of the UK population knew what symptoms they were being asked to be alert to (35). Additionally, the role of healthcare professionals is important, the data showed that people were more positive when the healthcare provider seemed willing to give them information and talk to them (22).

Accurate and informative communication links closely to the identified themes, “symptom severity” (a facilitator), and the theme “low concern about symptoms” (a barrier). If people are not sufficiently educated about relevant symptoms they may not feel it is appropriate to access healthcare, or report their symptoms; therefore, clear advice on severity and nature of symptoms is needed. These data are consistent with other studies which have shown that when people think their symptoms are minor or unimportant, they are less likely to report them (4). When people believed they had a genuine illness, and that symptoms were severe or serious, they would report them (19). These findings are supported by studies which show the greater the perceived perception of illness severity, the more likely they are to engage in precautionary behaviours (36), for example contacting the healthcare service. While in daily life, such attitudes may be appropriate, during the COVID-19 outbreak, this represents a substantial problem for testing and contact tracing services. Given that people are infectious even if asymptomatic, it is essential to encourage people to report even mild symptoms without delay. A focus on this in messaging will be required, as our data suggest that this runs contrary to most people’s natural inclinations.

Anxiety about exposure also increased people’s motivations to seek advice or report symptoms. When people were concerned that their individual situation increased their susceptibility to a disease, they were more likely to engage with the healthcare system. In contrast, fear about what might happen next once ‘within the system’ was identified consistently across studies, where it acted as a barrier to reporting symptoms. These findings suggest that it is important to reduce fear about being infected by visiting a healthcare setting, or about receiving treatment, but instilling a sufficiently realistic degree of concern about the illness that motivates people to engage with the system.

Practical issues were regularly reported in the evidence. Having a health care facility embedded in the local community, and within walking distance was a facilitator for people reporting symptoms. However, when facilities were deemed too far to get to, too expensive to travel to, or too difficult to travel to, this was seen as a barrier. The cost of accessing the healthcare system was also a consideration for many. Indirect economic factors were also important. People reported difficulties with getting time of work and not having paid sick leave. During an emerging infectious disease outbreak, tackling economic barriers to seeking testing should be an essential component of any fully functioning public health response.

Evidence on the associated features for those seeking healthcare and those reporting symptoms showed clear differences between women and men, different age groups, and people from different ethnic backgrounds. Studies showed that women consistently reported symptoms more often, and were more likely to seek healthcare than men; highlighting that more needs to be done to engage the male population. However, the data were not consistent in relation to age or ethnicity.

Strengths & Limitations

Despite this being a rapid review of the evidence, we conducted a comprehensive search strategy across multiple databases, with screening conducted by two independent reviewers. The review includes 16 studies providing a depth of evidence from across the globe, supporting the generalisability of findings. We have described these studies in detail, and demonstrated clear themes in the analysis to enhance understanding of the existing evidence. However, as with all rapid reviews, several limitations must be considered. We cannot rule out the possibility that other potentially relevant evidence exists which has not been included. Additionally, a number of the included studies were rated moderate or low quality, this was often due to suboptimal reporting of included participants and research methods.