Abstract
Introduction During any emerging infectious disease outbreak, people with symptoms of the illness are often asked to report their symptoms to the health service in a timely manner, to facilitate contact tracing. Numerous factors may influence an individual’s willingness to report these symptoms. Understanding these factors has become urgent during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Objective To determine which factors influence symptom reporting during an emerging infectious disease outbreak.
Methods We conducted a rapid review of the evidence. We included papers based on primary research; published in a peer-reviewed journal; written in English; included factors associated with symptom reporting or accessing healthcare; and related to a major public health incident involving an infectious disease outbreak.
Main results Five themes were identified as facilitators of symptom reporting or accessing healthcare: accurate and informative communication; symptom severity; concern about exposure; ease of access; and relationship with the healthcare provider. Seven themes were identified as barriers of symptom reporting or accessing healthcare: lack of knowledge; fear; stigmatization; invasion of privacy; low concern about symptoms; economics; and practicalities of attending a healthcare facility.
Discussion & Conclusion If contract tracing services are to be effective, members of the public need to have the capability, opportunity and motivation to use them. The themes identified should be used to evaluate the information provided to the public about such a service, the routes of access, and the underlying policies relating to the service, in order to ensure that as many people as possible with relevant symptoms will make contact.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
PC and OMV are funded by Go-Science. The review was conducted at the request of the Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Behaviours (SPI-B),a behavioural science advisory group for the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) Coronavirus response team, who provide scientific and technical advice to support UK government decision makers GJR was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in Emergency Preparedness and Response, a partnership between Public Health England, King's College London, and the University of East Anglia. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of NIHR, Public Health England or the Department of Health and Social Care.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical approval was not sought for this systematic review
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Those interested in the data extracted from the included studies may contact the corresponding author
