Abstract
A kinetic approach is developed, in a “tutorial style” to describe the evolution of an epidemic with spread taking place through contact. The “infection - rate” is calculated from the rate at which an infected person approaches an uninfected susceptible individual, i.e. a potential recipient of the disease, up to a distance p, where the value of p may lie between pmin ≤ p ≤ pmax. We consider a situation with a total population of N individuals, living in an area A, x(t) amongst them being infected while xd(t) = β′x(t) is the number that have died in the course of transmission and evolution of the epidemic. The evolution is developed under the conditions (1) a faction α(t) of the [N-x(t) – xd(t)] uninfected individuals and (2) a β(t) fraction of the x(t) infected population are quarantined, while the “source events” that spread the infection are considered to occur with frequency υ0. The processes of contact and transmission are considered to be Markovian. Transmission is assumed to be inhibited by several processes like the use of “masks”, “hand washing or use of sanitizers” while “physical distancing” is described by p. The evolution equation for x(t) is a Riccati - type differential equation whose coefficients are time-dependent quantities, being determined by an interplay between the above parameters. A formal solution for x(t) is presented, for a “graded lockdown” with the parameters, 0≤ α(t), β(t)≤1 reaching their respective saturation values in time scales, τ1, τ2 respectively, from their initial values α(0)=β(0)=0. The growth is predicted for several BBMP wards in Bengaluru and in urban centers in Chikkaballapur district, as an illustrative case. Above selections serve as model cases for high, moderate and thin population densities. It is seen that the evolution of [x(t)/N] with time depends upon (a) the initial time scale of evolution, (b) the time scale of cure and (c) on the time dependence of the Lockdown function Q(t) = {[1-α(t)]·[1-β(t)]}. The formulae are amenable to simple computations and show that in order to curb the spread one must ensure that Q(∞) must be below a critical value and the vigilance has to be continued for a long time (at least 100 to 150 days) after the decay starts, to avoid all chances of the infection reappearing.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
No external support was received for this work
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
NA
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The data used in this study was taken from regular press releases by public health authorities and govt sources.
